User talk:Clamn

The goals and focus of our edits for the home care page were to add important context primarily for the "United States" section of the page. More specifically, we worked on adding details to the "Professionals providing care," "Concept," and "Types of Services" sub-sections. We also worked to add in new sections including a "History" section. Additionally, we attempted to add credibility to this page by including more references throughout and a detailed table with information on types of home care providers.
 * User:Clamn - I see that the purpose of your edits to the home care page was to add important context. However, Articles for Creation should not be used to edit existing articles or change existing articles.  By copying an entire lengthy article and resubmitting it as your own, you evidently were not aware that you were violating Wikipedia's copyright by stripping attribution as to history.  It appears that you were acting in good faith, but that what you did is not permitted.  To add to existing articles, it is best if your edits may be controversial to discuss them first on the article talk page, and reach consensus.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Home care has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Home care. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Home care (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Home care may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Home care


A tag has been placed on Draft:Home care requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from ::https://en.wikipedia.org/Home_care. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)