User talk:Clamorformore

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Clamorformore for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mayalld (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

{unblock|I am new to Wikipedia. I tried to put references on a page that was accused of lacking references. I made no accusations towards anybody. I have been referred to as "amateurish" and generally slandered. What is the overall goal here? Can anybody explain why newbies are thrown into the fire? Are others opinions "freer" than the substantiation and one vote that I provide? I expect very little. My experience is that a small group of users have a much tighter grip on access to Wikipedia than what is promised. With this, I rest by setting forth the following challenge: please compare my comments with those of any other "more senior" user and, remaining as unbiased as possible, explain which are more professional. More importantly, discuss why my comments do not comport with the very tests (WP:N and WP:BIO) that Wikipedia has provided for users generally and why the other users are excused from this standard. As I look over it, the deletion discussion board diverges greatly from content-neutral bans on speech. The overriding preoccupation with "sockpuppetry" has eclipsed any actual need for thoughtful discussion amongst the gatekeepers.}}