User talk:Clare500

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 13:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

October 2012
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tomorrow's Company seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, – GorillaWarfare (talk) 12:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hello, Clare500. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tomorrow's Company, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. AlexTiefling (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Your addition to Tomorrow's Company has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Drm310 (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Please acknowledge and respond
Hi Clare,

I appreciate that you're trying to provide more information about Tomorrow's Company. However, Wikipedia policy requires that all information is verfiable, which is shown by backing it up with sources that are reliable and independent. All articles should be encyclopedic in tone, which means that they should never be written as though by the subject. An article about an organisation should not say "We are aiming to help people with Procrastination Syndrome."; it should always say "The Dithering Trust was established with the aim of helping people with Procrastination Syndrome." - and it should say, in a footnote, where that information came from. The language used should be original, and not violate copyright. We also avoid so-called peacock terms which make grandiose quality judgments about people and things. And as noted in the notice I posted in the previous section, you should avoid editing articles directly if you have a conflict of interest concerning the subject matter. If you wish to propose that material should be added to such an article, please make the request on the article's talk page.

I don't wish to appear unduly nagging, but you have posted material in breach of all the above policies several times today. Please respond here or at my talk page to let me know that you have seen and understood these messages. If I do not receive such a notification, I will be asking the admins to consider blocking you for a short time. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

WP:SPA and WP:ADVERT and WP:RS
Hello. You've been editing this article as a piece of WP:SPAM for over six years now without providing a single shred of WP:RS. The citation tag is itself over four and a half years old, yet you've never addressed it. Your only purpose here, as a WP:SPA, has been to promote your company in violation of WP:COI. I doubt that this company is notable at all and am considering pushing for it to be deleted entirely from Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, after all, not a free web hosting service for you to heap accolades upon a corporation and its executives. Frankly, I'm surprised that this abuse has been allowed to go on for as long as it has. Qworty (talk) 00:50, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomorrow's Company


A tag has been placed on Tomorrow's Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomorrow's Company


A tag has been placed on Tomorrow's Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Anbu121 ( talk me ) 13:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Tomorrow's Company for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomorrow's Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tomorrow's Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anbu121 ( talk me ) 17:32, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Do not delete speedy delete templates
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Tomorrow's Company, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 17:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomorrow's Company


A tag has been placed on Tomorrow's Company, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 19:48, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tomorrow's Company Logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:Tomorrow's Company Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSK ● talk ● evidence 20:36, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article for the second time. Let me try togive you some personal assistance -- this is not a prebuilt message.

The first question is whether your group is notable enough for a WP article. It might well be., but this has to be shown by substantial references to it from independent published sources, such as major newspapers.

The second requirement is that none of the material be taken from your website or other previous publication. For the image, follow exactly the procedure for giving a license.

The third, is the the material be written in a neurtral reporting tone. Don't use adjectivesof prasise; don't say that your organization is important, whow that it is, by the references. Everything you say, except the basic facts, must be taken from third party sources, not your own website.

When you are ready, try again. To prevent your wasting your time & ours' with versions that will not be accepted, I've protected it against re-creation for a few days to give you time to find the references and do it right, but it should be posible by the middle of next week. If you need any help, ask me on my talk page  DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tomorrow's Company Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tomorrow's Company Logo.png, which you've sourced to The permission field doesn't actually have any indication that permission was granted for upload, public domain or not. In addition, using "Head of Communication sent to me" isn't really a valid source.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GSK ● talk ● evidence 17:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 19:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)