User talk:Clarissa1925

January 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at David Lidington. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

rubbish! You cannot revert referenced material. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's not true or valid for Wikipedia! It appears this user is vandalous and has a habit of reverting valid referenced content (see [] Clarissa1925 (talk)

Welcome!
Hi, Clarissa1925. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on David Lidington. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.As per WP:BRD please take to the talkpage and discuss there. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC) I am in a editing dispute with you! Are you stupid? I have notified Wikipedia admin. Defo conflict of interest and disruptive editing
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at David Lidington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly."An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material" Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your AIV report
User:Emir of Wikipedia is not a vandal and your report is about a content dispute, not vandalism. --Neil N  talk to me 13:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

January
Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that your recent contribution to United Kingdom general election, 2017 has been undone because it is not constructive. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. &#8209; &#8209; Gareth Griffith&#8209;Jones&#160;The Welsh Buzzard &#8209; &#8209; 14:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)