User talk:Clarityfiend/2011

Thomas Howes (actor)
Dear Clarityfiend, would you mind if I recreated a page for Thomas Howes (which you and others voted to delete). I am just watching Downton Abbey again - a major (judged by viewing figures and comments) UK TV series, and Howes has what seems to me a sufficiently prominent role to warrant a page. I have added further refs. to his stage and radio career also, which helps I think. I have a draft here: User:Msrasnw/Thomas Howes (actor). What do you think? The Downton Abbey page's redlink on Howes looks anachronistic. RonhJones one of the deleting admins said I should contact you. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 15:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC))
 * I'm sorry, but those additional references don't help at all. They mostly just mention him in passing; the exceptions aren't any better: his CV posted by a talent agency and his IMDb entry. It comes back to his Downton Abbey role (plus his Yorkshire Post interview). I haven't seen the show, but "Second Footman" doesn't sound at all significant. If you can prove otherwise, then you might have a chance. Otherwise, the result would be the same. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Newsletter
It looks like I'll need to rephrase the message. Anyway, you can stop delivery here. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Someone with a sour disposition (a Saints fan, perhaps?) deleted your entry: I thought it was funny. And that game certainly was a stunning upset. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 10:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh well. It wasn't really appropriate to the refdesk anyway. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

PVS
Naughty! Bielle (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm a baaaad boy. But I just couldn't resist. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I really can't let something like this stand. You should know better. wp:BLP and all. Buddy431 (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It's not BLP, since no one is going to mistake it for "information", but I suppose it does cross over the line as far as just plain civility is concerned. P.S. I've refactored your edit since there's already a section about this. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Reference Desk Removal
Special:Contributions/86.4.183.90 has deleted one of your contributions on the reference desk:. It is being discussed on the talk page, if you'd like to comment. Buddy431 (talk) 05:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

List
I think the List of denaturalized Americans would be more precise and accurate as List of denaturalized United States citizens. What sayest thou? Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I considered something like that when I started the article, but rejected it because it looked odd to me to have "denaturalized" and "citizen" together; if you're one, you're not the other. There's got to be a better title than the current one, but I haven't come up with it yet. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * How about List of denaturalized former citizens of the United States? Clarityfiend (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Best one so far. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 04:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia!
 Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia! Hey Bzuk  (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Personal finances of professional athletes
Hello! Your submission of Personal finances of professional athletes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 11:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've reviewed your further work on this article. Unfortunately currently the article bears an NPOV cleanup tag, and therefore must be declined for DYK as "requiring substantial further work". The phrases in question are ones like "so often handled badly" and "some even manage".  "Badly" is inherently a subjective judgement; it either needs to be part of an attributed quote, or removed.  (eg "The personal finances of athletes are often handled in a manner that results in...")  Similar problems run through the rest of the article, such as to require a substantial rewrite of large parts of it (therefore, "requiring substantial further work"). - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Richard Sakakida
Hello! Your submission of Richard Sakakida at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Ecstasy copy
Hello. You may be interested in Talk:Ecstasy (film). Regards, Open4D (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Richard Sakakida
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

AfD Sedra Bistodeau - review?
I've improved the citations, added some material. This has moved me from neutral to Weak Keep, but it's possible I'm starting to get too close to the subject. In any case, the initial AfD posting significantly understates her accomplishments: she's won several national-level U.S. fiddling competitions, has been the sole subject of one RS newspaper article, and also of 5-1/2 minutes of public television documentary (albeit metropolitan/state TV, not national.) Your added input on the discussion (per WP:MUSICBIO guidelines) would be welcome; it's possible she still falls short. Yakushima (talk) 10:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

List of denaturalized former citizens of the United States
Hi. How do you like how I have expanded the list you created? I think it looks good but please let me know if there are any problems or whatever comments you may have. Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 23:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. However, I've commented out the restriction on U.S.-born people; as far as I can see, nobody on the list so far is affected. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. It was more of advice on the parameters for anyone contributing (although hardly anyone is besides you and me). Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also thanks for the Yul Brynner explanation. I just noticed. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 02:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * "It sure is a puzzlement" how he managed to get himself into such a mess. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Dale Maple
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   00:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

All Mine To Give
Hi.. I live in Eureka, WI where this biography took place. I have uploaded a picture of the historical marker where the Eunson family lived on the Fox River. If you would like to include it in your article or create a link by highlighting Eureka in your article, please feel free to do so. The WikiArticle is Eureka, Winnebago County, Wisconsin. I would do it myself but am unsure if it fits the guidelines for movie topics. Thanks much! Eurekanative (talk) 23:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The picture might be appropriate for the Eureka article, but I don't see it really fitting into the film page. Thanks anyway. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm glad I asked you first. Thank you much!  Eurekanative (talk) 01:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for improving the denaturalized list. I made an addition. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 04:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Vorkosigan Saga
Hi Clarityfiend,

I noticed you've been cleaning up the Vorkosigan Saga article after the IP posted about its being confusing, and I'd like to help, but I don't want to get in your way. What is your plan for the article?

I've been thinking for a while (just hadn't had the time to get around to it yet) that all(/most of?) the books should be split out into their own articles. It would make it a lot more readable. The article is currently 42 KB, which is big enough that WP:SIZERULE advises considering splitting. And many other series of this size have separate articles for each book.

So I think I'll probably do that over the next couple days, but I wanted to check that this wouldn't mess up whatever you're planning to do. Also, if you have any suggestions on where I could help out on the article, please let me know. Princess Lirin (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I was considering trimming the plot summaries, but splitting them off would do just as well. I don't have an overall plan, so whatever you do won't interfere with it. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Human computer
Hi--the USA Today article on the Rosies documentary--tardy as it is--is interesting, but is something of a fourth-hand source. It would be better to cite something from the documentary itself. In any case, the summary you provided was not accurate, so I've removed it. Robert K S (talk) 04:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

List of denaturalized former citizens of the United States
Thanks for the improvements to the list. I'll get the hang of it one of these days! Yours, Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas' Legion
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for James L. Fisk
Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Lawrence of Arabia
Hello, I am considering improving Lawrence of Arabia (film) to Featured Article status for its 50th anniversary in December 2012. We can have it on the main page on the anniversary of its premiere. I just did some re-formatting of the article and have cleaned up the talk page to use for listing references. I see that you are one of the main contributors at the article. Would you be interested in collaborating? Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

My DYK nom of 1965 Skyways Coach-Air Avro 748 crash
Re your review, you seem to have omitted to check the hook fact for verification. I've made a few tweaks to the article and replied to your comments at T:TDYK. Mjroots (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ágnes Farkas
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   11:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I neither created nor substantially expanded the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Your copyedit of the expanded article was essential, I would not have nominated the article for DYK without it. The article had been on my watchlist since its creation back in 2008, so it was satisfactory to see that its expansion also made the article suitable for DYK. Oceanh (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Hannah (1849 shipwreck)
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Taurica
Very cool work on Taurica! Thanks for helping with the cleanup. Regards. --Codrin.B (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I just hope what was there was accurate; it always makes me a bit antsy when I work on material of which I know little. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Kennedy half dollar
Hi Clarity. Thanks for the CE of Kennedy half dollar! It looks a lot better, and I believe that it will become an FA for sure. Your help is really appreciated.-RHM22 (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * By the way, I noticed on your user page that you improved the Lawrence of Arabia article. I'm not sure if you like the movie, but it's one of my favorites. I really like the theme especially. I'm sure you already know this, but the excellent Peter O'Toole would have won the Oscar that year if it wasn't for the equally excellent Gregory Peck in To Kill a Mockingbird. That was a great year for movies.-RHM22 (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I'm a big fan of both Lawrence of Arabia and O'Toole, but I haven't seen To Kill a Mockingbird yet, so I can't voice an opinion on which performance was more deserving. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I liked O'Toole as Lawrence better, but Gregory Peck in Mockinbird is really good also. I believe the year was 1962, right? You really can't go wrong with Peter O'Toole and Alec Guinness. Really good.-RHM22 (talk) 04:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi
I saw you re-added the contenious section sourced by Scottish friends of Israel which I removed with the explaination that several editors called it a non reliable source here. Thanks, Passionless -Talk  03:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, Thanks, Passionless -Talk  03:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Ap Bac
Hi, I'd just started copyediting Battle of Ap Bac as per the WP:GOCE when I noticed that you tagged it is "working" (you were too quick for me :) ). I didn't get far and for what it's worth this is what I did:

The Battle of Ap Bac, also known in Vietnam as the American War, was a major battle fought during the early stages of the Vietnam War. The event took place in Dinh Tuong Province (now part of Tien Giang Province), South Vietnam, on January 2, 1963.

==Background==

Fighting between the South Vietnamese Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) and the Communist National Liberation Front (commonly known as the Viet Cong), began in the late 1950s in the Mekong River region. With the advantage of extensive United States aid, the South Vietnamese military were initially able to inflict heavy casualties on the Viet Cong. However, despite fielding armoured personnel carriers and helicopters, South Vietnamese commanders were usually reluctant to press home their advantage, being averse to absorbing casualties that could be detrimental to their military careers. Throughout 1962, South Vietnamese soldiers of the 7th Infantry Division often found themselves in position to trap and destroy battalion-sized Viet Cong units in battles across the Mekong Delta, but their commanders usually allowed the Viet Cong to retreat rather than risk taking casualties.

Best, ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 00:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Parachute Regiment (United Kingdom)
Just a line to say thank you for your edits on Parachute Regiment (United Kingdom). Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Bahrain
Hi, I'm hitting edit conflicts with you on this article. I've tagged it CE in progress and as "working" on the GOCE page. Can you please wait until I've finished before doing any more? Thanks ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 21:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw that after my last major edit and have moved on to another country. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You emigrated over this? Wow! :) ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 01:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, this here country wasn't big enough for the two of us. One of us had to mosey along before sundown, pardner. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ha Ha. Take care. See ya around, pardner. ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 21:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Re:Soviet Union
Sorry, there was no particular reason, just a mistake. I meant only to reinsert a mention of "Soviet Russia" (apparantly removed previously by another editor), but somehow I got reverted your recent edit. I've returned all your work. By the way, thanks for the mass improvements to the article! Grey Hood   Talk  20:21, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand. Thanks. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the help
Thank you for the copyedit to Netball at the Olympics. The fixes you made were really, really good. :) The article feels much more clear now than it was before. :) --LauraHale (talk) 02:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've made more major changes. Hope you approve. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

TJ Hogg
Thanks for the help with the copyediting!
 * Does this mean I get to Hogg the credit? Clarityfiend (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * lol, sure, go ahead. Qrsdogg (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Notable person(s) or subject matter excluded
Looking for American actor Timothy Scott (b.1937 - d.1995).Fjh3cherokee (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Moved to reference desk. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Needing some assistance
How do I add you to my watchlist?Fjh3cherokee (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The WP:WATCHLIST is only for monitoring pages, not editors. There is another way to track what I'm doing. Is this what you want, and if so, why? Are you looking for a WP:MENTOR? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

International Gendarmerie
When I put "Got it" on the requests page, that means I'm editing it. Lfstevens (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If you check the history of the requests page, you'll see that I claimed it first. My "working" also precedes your "Got it". Clarityfiend (talk) 00:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * There was no claim there when I marked it, else I wouldn't have marked it. The timestamp shows we both took it during the same minute. I blame WP! I did complete a pass before you started work, and just harv'd all the refs. I don't plan any other changes... Lfstevens (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * For the record, I believe I started editing first; I just edited the whole article at once. When I tried to save my work, I got an edit conflict. However, since you're so bound and determined to take it, fine. I'm not going to waste my time arguing about it. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not to argue, but you saved several times, not once. Once you got the conflict, I would have appreciated a heads up, so we could both save time. Did you merge your changes into mine, or save over the top? Lfstevens (talk) 01:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Why are you continuing to squabble over some essentially meaningless prize? Are you that hard up for an extra thousand words? I'm going to humor you this once, but after this, you're tangoing on your own.


 * I staked my claim first. Race officials don't go to Usain Bolt and say, "you won, but this other competitor thinks he did, so we're going to award him the gold medal."


 * Once I was notified of an edit conflict, I checked the requests page, then your edits. Since my work was more extensive than yours, I decided to paste mine on top and add back yours (mostly) afterward. That explains why my first edit is several minutes later than yours, and why there were several edits.


 * Then, when you decided that wasn't good enough, I threw up my hands and walked away. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for copy editing of the article International Gendarmerie.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Hank Williams
Hi, thanks for taking the time to correct the copy-edits on the article. I just wanted to know if the work was completely done or you have to do more work, the reason I ask this is just to know if it is copy-edit free to nominate it already to GA. In case that the work is already done, could you place the template? Thanks again for your time.-- GD uwen  Tell me!  16:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm done (though that intro is a bit long IMO). I'm also confused. Why do you want a copyedit template? That would indicate that I didn't do a good job. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh, no, no I think you did a good job. I had a confusion with the name of the template, I was referring to this template. I apologize for the confusion, and thanks again for the copy-editing!-- GD uwen  Tell me!  22:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not a Guild member, just a rogue editor roaming the wild. But thanks for the complement. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know that, anyway thanks again for the review.-- GD <font color="#273BE2" size="2.5px">uwen  <font color="cyan" size="0.5px">Tell me!  23:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Koekjes
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Buster7 has given you a Nice Koekjes which promote fellowship, goodwill and WikiLove. As a fellow "rogue editor roaming the wild" I thought you might like a little sustenance to get you thru the day. Nice Biscuits are very tasty and have been known to be so NICE, they will even bake themselves. So feel free to pass them around. Enjoy! <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black">Buster Seven  <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black"> Talk 


 * Thanks. I definitely needed that. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur S. Herman
When you voted to delete at Articles for deletion/Arthur S. Herman, the article was an unreferenced stub. Since then, a few editors (myself included) have substantially expanded the article, with multiple citations to articles and sources about Herman. If you have a chance to take a second look, you may have a different take. Either way, I thought it appropriate to leave a head's up on the issue. Thanks. Cbl62 (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Janet Smith case
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Leigh Woods
Hi, I noticed your edits to Leigh Woods. I agree with your removal of "evocatively named" as being POV, but wondered why you removed the convert template for the area & the bold from Parardise Bottom which redirects to this article?&mdash; Rod talk 20:22, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not good English (AFAIK) to say "2 square kilometres area". Clarityfiend (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

List of people known as The Black
Do you think Edward, the Black Prince would qualify, or is that not quite the same thing in your opinion? --NellieBly (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Going by standard disambiguation guidelines, he doesn't qualify, but I wouldn't object to creating a See also section for him. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I've done so. It's a reasonable similarity but you're right, it doesn't quite fit. --NellieBly (talk) 03:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Reparing cut-and-paste move of Wilhelmshaven mutiny
In December you did some copy-editing of Wilhelmshaven mutiny. In the mean time another user had made a copy-paste move of the article to Sailors' revolt in Kiel. I have undone the move and moved the new content from Sailors' revolt in Kiel to Wilhelmshaven mutiny – at the same time undoing your improvements. If you feel your version is better, please revert my latest edit. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive update
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The House on 92nd Street
Hi, just a picky correction. Plot says sodium pentathol was used as a truth drug on Dietrich - I just watched the film and it was actually scopolamine. Hope this is helpful....Geoff 79.68.122.191 (talk) 13:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Uff course, ich kann nicht just accept your vord alone. I must ask you to kommen sie mit for a little "friendly" questioning, Herr 79 (if zat is your real name). Clarityfiend (talk) 21:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Yellow Canary (film) and Northern Pursuit
See changes to both articles. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC).

The Bald
Hi. I think the articles should be called The Bald and The Bold. I think the "List of people known as" is unnecessary. I think you should simply name it The Bald etc.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Why go against WP:LISTNAME? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Oops
Oops, my apologies, butteryfingers on my part. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 23:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Nagato
Hi Clarityfiend. I saw some of your work over at the Battle of Midway article. Would you mind coming by the piece on the Japanese battleship Nagato and see if you can help bring a consensus opinion to the lead section regarding whether or not the ship was considered obsolete by the IJN admiralty at the outset of the war. I think not, but your opinion would be appreciated. Thanks. Gunbirddriver (talk) 04:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd like to help, but I have no clue one way or the other. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Cowardly Lion
I was looking at the new post at Wizard Oz about the costume and I was checking some of the ref's and came back and it was gone and I was thinking "no way" that had great potential. Usually when you see that big of a post to an established article it's an almost auto-revert. Anyway I just wanted to say what a great move you made. I never would of come up with comparison to the slippers and would of not suggested the removal, now the information is saved and in it's proper place. Thank you, it's refreshing to see such insight and ingenuity. Mlpearc  powwow  05:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It's nice to be appreciated. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Thought you might like a third voice here! :) DBaK (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy
Re your latest speedy request under db-g7 - you are quite within your rights to request this but I actually found it quite interesting. We have a number of dab/set index pages at WP:ISLE such as Eilean Fraoch of a similar nature (admittedly all one language) and I thought I'd suggest a move to "Big Water (disambiguation)" or similar. Ben  Mac  Dui  19:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Let me think it over for a little while. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, I think the best thing to do is to nominate it for Afd and see what happens. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Copy edit Battle of Romani
Thanks for the copyedit. Its really appreciated.

Regarding the German and Ottoman force I think the foot artillery and trench mortar do constitute the Austrian artillery and I've cut a couple of semicolons to clarify, hopefully. Regarding the 3rd Inf Div of 3 regiments they apparently totalled 16,000 men of whom 11,000 to 11,873 were combatants. I've included this detail because often times in the literature Ottoman units are said to be understrength.

Regarding the casualty figures - I realise these are not consistent - different sources. Also regarding the table it was copied from the source as it stood and I extrapolated from it to add the totals. Not sure what should be done - what do you think? :) --Rskp (talk) 06:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for having another look at this article. I've moved that citation to try to reflect that part of the table it relates to and added a ref to the info, which had preceded the table, now at the end of the subsection. Regarding the 16,000 men its my understanding that they are part of the 3rd Division. Regarding cutting the (Lowland) and (Lancashire) of the 52nd and 42nd Divisions and 'infantry' in some places - I'm not sure about this.--Rskp (talk) 05:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * As for the long division names, it's pretty standard practice to shorten them. See First Battle of El Alamein and 50th (Northumbrian) Infantry Division for example. There's no danger of the reader confusing the 52nd with some other unit. It's just too cumbersome the other way. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

MIT
Hi

The editor who requested the copyedit has been blocked. As a result, the articles that they have requested copyedits on have been examined. The MIT article is already a GA and seems to be in a good state, indeed it seems to be enough shape for the GAR to be dismissed.

It also looks as if you have not started the copyedit, possibly as you have two articles listed as "working". As a result I have deleted the copyedit request. If you have been copyediting offline though, feel free to continue.

Can you also please only put your name to one article from the requests page at a time :¬) Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 15:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Alex McDonald (prospector)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Hey there. When I edit character articles, I generally use a lot of long quotes from the actors but I only use the block format when it's humungous. For example, I used a lot of heavy quotes on Quinn Fabray, Kurt Hummel, and Rachel Berry. It's just not the typical format I use personally, but I'm not sure if that goes against WP:MOS. I don't think it does, but if it is then I can restore it. HorrorFan121 (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, here we go. WP:MOSQUOTE says more than four lines or more than a single paragraph (more stringent than I thought). That still applies to many of Benz's quotes. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

 * Thank you. Drop in anytime. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

thank you and a request
Hello, As the OP requesting 7-word summaries of Shakespeare, I was extremely impressed by your summarizing skills. You must be among the top summarizers I've ever seen in action. Now, I have a request:

''could you summarize the subjects/areas of your expertise (I mean summarize the fields themselves), each with a heroic couplet; i.e. summarize each subject in 2 lines, with one subject following another? So, you would have a heroic couplet for history, one for literature, one for biology, etc.''

I was very disappointed, but another person I made this request to was unable to get back to me. :( I realize this is a daunting task.  Don't feel judged, but I would feel so appreciative if you would give it an honest go... :)

Here is a go from me at a few things I do know a little bit about, which is communism, computer science, and translation: The eager "Comrade!" with which the fresh land starts Gives way to "Comrade!" to cover cold, black hearts. Pure logic from the moldy earth distilled, Is soon with models, objects, layers filled. New translators strive to keep their errors few; Few progress to learn to speak a thing anew.

Thanks so much for trying! 188.28.228.34 (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Eh? Thanks for your faith in me, but I think I'll pass. Poetry takes a lot more time and effort than I'm willing to commit at this time. Inside may be a poet, but I don't know it. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Awww. I do understand.  Consider the above lines a tribute to yourself and dedicated to you, then!  Cheers, 188.28.227.240 (talk) 11:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Beijing copyedit
Thank you for handling my request. I'll look it over in the coming days and get back to you if I have any concerns.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  12:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Personal attack at WP:RDE
Please kindly retract it. Making such rude slurs as you ahve done (even when they are placed in the conditional "if") against my character is not appreciated. -- Jayron  32  02:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Rude slur?!? I'd call that a gross misreading of the intent and content of my comment. Clarityfiend (talk)
 * Gross misreading? I'd call that a deliberate misrepresentation of my overreaction!  -- Jayron  32  03:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Man, what's with you today? I suggest you ask a few editors you respect if they can detect a slur in there. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow. You really don't like to joke around, do you?  Sorry I tried to lighten the mood around here.  I won't do it in your presense again.  -- Jayron  32  05:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * When you blow hot one moment and cold the next, don't be surprised if you confuse the heck out of your audience. Anyway, let's put this unfortunate misunderstanding behind us and forget it ever happened. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I thought you were joking, and so responded with what I thought was a joke response.  I just want to make clear that not a single comment I have made regarding this issue was serious (excepting perhaps this one).  I'm sorry we apparently got our wires crossed.  I meant no offense by the whole thing, but it clearly caused some friction here, and for that I apologize.  -- Jayron  32  05:59, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the problem started when the first few comments looked all too real to me. I understand now. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Deleted reference desk response
Regarding I hope you don't mind. Please feel free to delete this comment. 99.24.223.58 (talk) 20:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * What exactly do you find so objectionable about my response? Clarityfiend (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Korkoro
'Romani occupation in France' stands for their stay in France. It is actually a translation from a French article. And the 'other than' later in that paragraph was included as there was already a mention of Catherine Ringer and Dahmani as being vocalists in the album. Thanks a lot for your help. The article looks much better now. morelM William 09:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Hopefully I'll get the rest done tomorrow. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I think 'association' would be a better word than 'stay' as the latter narrows down the scope. Also the facts you removed from the background section would be essential, I feel, as not many would be aware of the inconsistencies with regard to their documentation. In fact I had to bring that section to the top as suggested in the peer review as a reviewer felt that many readers wouldn't know what Porajmos is. The development section follows this, starting with the difficulties he faced in putting together the less available information. Also, later in the casting section, there is a mention of Gatlif visiting Transylvania to find Romani actors. It would look disconnected without the facts about Transylvania in the background section, driving the reader to do external research. These are just what I feel. Thanks again.  morelM William 10:30, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have to disagree. This isn't an article about the Porajmos, and I believe there is just enough left for the reader to understand the film's context. Note that the last sentence in the Background subsection refers to the persecution in "Nazi-occupied countries". Anyway, I'm done, though I'll probably make another sweep later for any overlooked rough spots. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have an another request. Do you think the lead can be expanded? I think that might be a problem when it gets a GAN. I did a minor addition to the box office section, adding the distributors' name which is mentioned in many sources. morelM William 05:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your help. So, are you done with it? If not, could you leave a note on the talk page when you are done so that the peer reviewers can start their review on the content? morelM William 15:13, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your help. You did a brilliant work in getting rid of the repetitions! morelM William 12:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Squab copyedit?
Hi - I was just wondering if you feel you've finished the copyedit for Squab (food), because you haven't put the GOCE template on it? It looks a lot better now, thank you! --Malkinann (talk) 09:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm done. I didn't add a template because I'm not a member of the GOCE. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Cheers, that makes sense. --Malkinann (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Sinking of F174
Let me know when you are done, so I could add the missing references. Those paragraph are from sourcers referenced in nearby paragraphs, shoud I duplicate the ref tag? --Jollyroger (talk) 10:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm done. You can see how to handle a reference when it's used in more than one place in "The territorial competency issue" subsection. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks--Jollyroger (talk) 07:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the copyediting on Maniac Mansion
First off, thank you for choosing to copyedit the Maniac Mansion article. Just to let you know that I've still to add some additional stuff in there (which should mostly be in the bottom half of the article), so if you want to take another look after all the extra stuff has been added, that would be great. I didn't realize that someone would copyedit it so quickly after posting it; I thought I would have time to add extra material in there before someone came by to copyedit it. No big deal, though, as every bit still helps in the long run. –MuZemike 00:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll keep an eye on things. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If you want to take another run-through of the article, you can if you like. At this point, I don't think there is too much more that can be added to the article. –MuZemike 00:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Wished to thank you for the work you've done in the Agustín Ross Cultural Center article; I left you some messages at my talk page. Cheers! -- Diego  talk 05:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the copyedit of Money No Enough!
I added some information to the last paragraph of the Reception section, so could you copyedit it again? In addition, I am not sure what you mean by "two of them described as copycats of Money No Enough". By "described", I mean described by critics, not by the official advertising or those involved in production. --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks okay to me. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Clarification
I'm not sure the right meaning was kept here. Local constructors lobbied to have the damaged monuments demolished despite being recoverable in order to have a chance to buy some prestigious lots in city center, to build new edifices but ultimately damaging the community. I understand (but may be wrong) your phrase as meaning that city officers had the building demolished in order to have more space for businesses to get through the hard times. --Jollyroger (talk) 10:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure James Cagney would thank you too
Thanks for the copyediting on the Cagney article! It's reading better already. When it's done, I'll address some of those clarifications you've included. Ged UK  12:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Queen Maud Land CE
Hi, I forgot to thank you for your quick and good response to my request for a copyedit of the Queen Maud Land article. Should you have any suggestions to further possible topics I could add to the article, feel free to give me a word. Kind regards, – Bellatores (t.) 21:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Your considerable help on the Zardari page was greatly appreciated, especially in light of its good article status and its featured article nomination. If I knew you personally, I would buy you a box of cookies! I hope we interact again on Wikipedia and I will gladly assist you.


 * Enough talk. Just deposit my 10% [cough cough] "service fee" into my overseas account. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:39, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Quick help
Could you copyedit the plot section of the article Ponnar Shankar? Thanks. morelM William 19:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

I've given it a copyedit myself. but extra eyes always appreciated21:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for your prompt response. morelM William 02:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

I suspect Quark
No apology necessary at all. :D I wasn't entirely sure, so not offended. And, as noted on Talk there, hers isn't at issue, so could be safely deleted. <font color="#3F00FF">Odo <font color="#C90016">don't think I can't see you, Guy 01:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Dom
Hi, I undid your reorder edit to Dom because it appears to set a special, subordinate category, 'People' over the generic. I haven't actually studied the MoS on this and stand to be corrected but I remember nothing in there and if it is the case it seems wrong to invert the hierachy. E x nihil (talk) 06:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Port of Rijeka copyedit
Hi! Thank you for copyediting the Port of Rijeka. Since I am not a native speaker of English, it is quite difficult for me to iron out every detail of the prose, besides a fresh pair of eyes are always better at detecting nonsensical sentences at which I may stare for days without any notice. I appreciate your efforts.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Than you

 * Thank you appreciate you taking the time. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

accomplished actress
Hello clarityfiend,

I see no basis for your opinion that Garbo was not "an accomplished actress." She was indeed an accomplished actress, as any Garbo expert will tell you. Many historians have argued that she was in her greatest roles (for example in Camille and Anna Karenina, brilliant. She won 4 Academy Award nominations and two New York Film Critics awards for best actress. She also won other awards and nominations. This is more than sufficient evidence for characterizing her as as an accomplished artist. All of these awards and nominations are listed in the filmography. She transformed acting technique in silent pictures and developed her acting style using a rigorous technique. I don't think you can you cite many sources who have determined that she was not an accomplish actress. Therefore, I think your assertion is incorrect. Unless you can make a persuasive case for your position I will put this phrase back in--98.74.166.17 (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I get it now. You deleted it because it is redundant. Forgive my hasty response. I don't think being a star and an icon necessarily means one is an accomplished actor. So i think it should re-insert it. Apologies again, --98.74.166.17 (talk) 21:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't think of anybody other than an actor/actress who is called a "film star". Also, "accomplished" to me describes somebody just a bit above average, very faint praise for Garbo. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Youre absolutely right. Why didn't I think of it? Thanks,--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 23:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Face/Off 1997 Film
Hello, my name's Billy.

It's difficult for me to understand some of the Events in the Movie called Face/Off

Are you able to answer any of my questions about the Movie called Face/Off? Yes or No.

1. Castor Troy has a girlfriend, Sasha.

2. In the movie, does Troy find out that Sasha gave birth to a kid? Yes or No.

3. When Archer breaks out of the prison, Archer goes to Dietrich's apartment.

4. When Pollux Troy informs Castor Troy that Archer's sitting inside Dietrich's apartment, Castor sends the FBI Team to Dietrich's apartment.

5. Since Pollux & Castor are brothers, it means that Pollux & Castor love each other.

6. Castor & Pollux are evil. Castor & Pollux are not gay. Castor & Pollux are not bi-sexual.

7. Why does Castor send the FBI Team to Dietrich's apartment?

8. Since Castor's sending the FBI TEAM to Dietrich's apartmnet, I know that it's because Castor wants Archer to die.

9. Since Castor's sending the FBI Team to Dietrich's apartment, is it also because Castor hates Dietrich? Yes or No.

10. Since Castor's sending the FBI Team to Dietrich's apartment, is it also because Castor hates Dietrich's henchmen? Yes or NO.

11. Since Castor's sending the FBI Team to Dietrich's apartment, is it also because Castor hates Sasha? YES OR NO.

12. In this movie, does Castor love Sasha? YES OR NO.

13. In this movie, does Castor stop loving Sasha? YES OR NO.

14. Does Sasha realize that Sean has Castor's face? Does Sasha realize that Castor has Sean's face? When does Sasha realize that Sean has Castor's face?(76.14.187.54 (talk) 04:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)).


 * Sorry. I've seen the movie, but it was too long ago for me to recall the details. #5 is true though, and there are no indications that either brother is gay or bisexual. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Garbo tweaks
Glad you're on the case. Nice editing. Improves the page; bravo. You're a fiend for tiny little changes, most of which improve but some of which strike me as 6 to one 1/2 a dozen to another! Alas! Also, I prefer "but" to "however" unless "however" is absolutely necessary. Still, all prose can be improved and I'm glad for your interest in this page since Garbo's deserves to be detailed and pitch-perfect. You must be an outstanding writer. So much more to be said about GG. Will try and get back to it next summer. Greetings,--Classicfilmbuff (talk) 16:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I was taught to avoid starting sentences with "but". But that's just me. Also, I suspect that part of your half a dozen remark pertains to my replacing "Garbo" with "her" in places; I dislike using her stage name in her early life before she actually used it, but can't come up with a better solution just yet. Clarityfiend (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi CF, I was taught by my brother, a journalist, to use "but" unless "however" is absolutely necessary! Look through a newspaper and you'll see the word however rarely. I think "but" is usually more powerful. It also keeps the momentum going forward, inother words, for pacing, and "however" usually changes the thought process and slows it down. No, no the half dozen remark referred to something I can't remember. But Good to replace Garbo with "her," etc. As for final question, I think the Garbo before name change keeps the entire piece in present tense, so better. FWIF. Greetings.We're reading now abut Garbo, not Gustaffson. Greetings, --Classicfilmbuff (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, well, well. It appears I'm wrong; butting in early (though not often) appears to be fine. I stand corrected. Thanks. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Message
What's your email address? My email address is [email redacted for safety]. For Face/Off movie, I'll be able to send the website address to your email address.(Sean Archer123 (talk) 07:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)).
 * What website address? In any case, you can either just type it here or use the "E-mail this user" feature in the toolbox on the left. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

MESSAGE
http://www.1channel.ch/external.php?title=Face%2FOff&url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tZWdhdmlkZW8uY29tL3YvMDZJVDlUN1k=&domain=bWVnYXZpZGVvLmNvbQ==&loggedin=0

That's the website address, so you can watch the movie called Face/Off 1997 film.(Sean Archer123 (talk) 07:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)).

Shy (song)
Songs by redlinked artists can be speedy deleted via WP:CSD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That's music to my ears. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

2nd copyedit Battle of Romani
Hi, Look I'm sorry about the comma drought but its what I was taught - no I shouldn't blame my teachers - but there you are. Also I really thought that putting a comma before 'and' was superfluous. 'Dictionary' provides the following - "Barbara Child claims that in American English there is a trend toward a decreased use of the comma (Child, 1992, p. 398). This is reinforced by an article by Robert J. Samuelson in 23:2007 Newsweek article "The Sad Fate of the Comma." Lynne Truss says that this is equally true in the UK, where it has been a slow, steady trend for at least a century." (Truss, 2004, p. 97–98) I'm just trying to be trendy!! :) :)

Seriously, I'm happy to follow your suggestions but thought I should share with you as you were sounding a bit ... . Really appreciate your work. All the best. --Rskp (talk) 06:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Nah, I'm not ticked off. I just got tired of putting the same old comment in the edit summary. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot for copyediting this article again. All the best --Rskp (talk) 01:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Katharine Hepburn
Hello there! I see from the contributors list on Kate Hepburn's article that you have edited it a fair bit, so I'm guessing you have some interest in her. I have also deduced, from your screen name, that you probably enjoy copy editing? If these two inferences are correct, I was wondering if you would be up for giving the page a proof read? I've pretty much completely rewritten it over the last month or so, and I feel like it is comprehensive now, but I know that I'm not the greatest writer in the world. I feel like it's a bit boringly written, and I'm sure I've made grammatical errors. If you could make any improvements to it, that would be great. I'm thinking of maybe putting it forward for a GA nomination in time... Don't feel any pressure to say yes to this though, it's completely up to you! --Lobo512 (talk) 19:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm in the middle of the GOCE drive (trying to get my 100K words before the end of the month), but I'll see what I can do. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That's very kind, thank you, but please don't push yourself into it if you're too busy. --Lobo512 (talk) 06:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná
Hello, Clarityfiend! How are you? Here, in Brazil, historians prefer to call him "Carneiro Leão". American historians, however, call him "Honório". Since this is the Wikipedia in English, I opted to use the name he is mostly known in English written sources. P.S.: Honório had a full sister (named Balbina) from his father's first marriage and three half-sisters and one half-brother (the latter the younger) from his second marriage. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The Manual of Style says that we should use the name most used on sources. American authors avoided calling him Carneiro Leão because there are several other important Carneiro Leão in Brazilian history. --Lecen (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps "Honório Hermeto"? This is how historian Roderick J. Barman calls him. --Lecen (talk) 02:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Every single moment that the words "Liberal" or "Moderate" or "Conservative" appear in the article they appear with the meaning of Party filiation, not of ideology. This is just as "the Republican Ronald Reagan" or "the Democrat Bill Clinton" (none of them are being called by ideology, such as Republicanism or Democracy, but by their party filiations, such as the Republican Party and Democratic Party). Thus, shouldn't "Liberal", "Moderate", "Courtier", "Saquarema", "Conservative", etc... be spelled with a higher case? Unless, of course, the MoS says otherwise. --Lecen (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, according to the MoS we should write "Liberal" to describe a member of the Liberal Party and "liberal" someone who is adept of the Liberalism. But this should only occur when the name of a Party could be misunderstood with an ideology (like a Democract U.S. Senator against a democract activist). Since there is no possibility that "saquarema" could ever be misunderstood (it isn't a Portuguese word, but an Indian word), there is no reason to capitalize. About the barnstar, well, you deserve it, after all, you did a great job there. I hope we may help each other in the future again. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your copy edit work on Horrible Bosses, it is much appreciated. I run out of ways to describe things and do end up using "the film" too much. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks

 * Thanks. I just got lucky browsing through Category:Four-masted ships. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

List_of_fictional_characters_with_surname_Carpenter
So much for adding a list separate from the main Carpenter surname page ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_characters_with_surname_Carpenter

There was no discussion, just deletion. All that work done with you to make things better. Gone without a chance to say anything. So much for the new attitude wikipedia administrators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.36.69 (talk) 01:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Your deletions on the Carpenter (Disambiguation) page appear to me, as well as others, as shown above, to have been done in an illogical and arbitrary, and hence discouraging, manner. Please provide a rationale for your deletions so that we may all share in your thought process and learn from it.Cohee (talk) 00:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It's neither illogical nor arbitrary. I've responded in the talk page of the article in question. (P.S. It's not helpful to your cause to cite a successfully WP:Afd'd page.) Clarityfiend (talk) 01:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

It is interesting that you cite a 2010 deleted article as reference. Articles for deletion/List of Carpenter named articles but not the recent 14 Sep 2011 deleted List of fictional characters with surname Carpenter where there was no discussion - just blanket deletion. Where is Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters with surname Carpenter? H'mm, no listing found. Now you are running roughshod using archane rules that conflict with other rules deleting items from the Carpenter (disambiguation) page? And instead of asking for discussion, consensus or clairification of Wiki rules/policy, you decide what is right? Are you going to create an edit war? Are you an administrator? Maybe it is time to start a real discussion and bring this out in the open. What you you think? Jrcrin001 (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I think that your thinking is quite muddled. You claim that I cited a deleted article as a reference when the opposite is true. Why are you bringing up a separate issue anyway?


 * They're not arcane rules; they're the accepted guidelines on what should or should not be included. Consensus has already been reached long ago. If you don't like it, you should contest it at WP:Disambiguation, not here. What "other rules" do you claim I've run "roughshod" over?


 * As for started a war, I haven't edited the page since the one you two seem to find objectionable, and initiated a discussion on the appropriate page, which is just what you wanted. So what's the problem? Clarityfiend (talk) 20:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Vidocq
Hi, thanks a lot for cleaning up the Vidocq article. I put some background related to the 'clarification needed' parts on the talk page. I am not a native English speaker so I'm a bit unsure how to put the information in the article in a way that it is still not too much but solves the open questions. So I was hoping you are willing to help again and adapt the text in a way that the tags are not needed anymore. -- Cecil (talk) 15:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

origin of life
In response to your request for books, see Stuart Kauffman's Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press, Technical monograph. ISBN 0195079515 There is no better theoretical work. μηδείς (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. My local library has a copy. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

However
Hi, just to say, that there is a strong practice of not starting a sentence with 'however'. Strunk and White, the definitive style guide used by publishers internationally since 1918 states “Avoid starting a sentence with however when the meaning is ‘nevertheless’”. (Strunk and White (2005) The Elements of Style p73.) It's echoed in any number of books on English usage (A grammar book, Edward Good, P 160, Writing with style Jacobi, p107). I know there are other viewpoints but to say 'no such ban exists' is to overlook these stylists. The ban very much exists in some quarters. Span (talk) 13:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Galilee Squadron
Hi Clarityfiend, could you take a look at the DYK nomination for Galilee Squadron again? An edtior has suggested an alternative hook and I've beefed up the relevant paragraph. Thank you, Poliocretes (talk) 06:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, it's not very often that one sees the expression "I'll withdraw my objection" on wikipedia :-). Poliocretes (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for James Smith (frontiersman)
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Gilligan's Island
Thank you for fixing that section, this poor article does attract its fair share of unsourced-opinion/fan-mag style writing. Shearonink (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Phew. I was afraid an angry fan was coming after me. It was a bit of an eyesore. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

You, sir, are a...
Good editor with a sharp eye, like in Hope Diamond. Like your improvements there and elsewhere.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Guess that makes me a jewel of an editor, or at least a diamond in the rough. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

King Creole
Hi, clarityfriend. I have been recently working in the article King Creole. It is under review for GA, and since I know you do a good job with copy-editing I would like to request your help (if you got some free time) It is currently on hold until Thursday 10th. Thanks for your time!-- <font color="#E62020" size="2.5px">GD <font color="#273BE2" size="2.5px">uwen  <font color="cyan" size="0.5px">Tell me!  23:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but I'm not done yet. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Now I'm done. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyedit needed
Hi! I noticed you're a member of the wikiproject film. I've recently worked on Jennifer Connelly's article along with other user. I'm afraid this needs to be copyedited and I'd appreciate if you could do that. Pay special attention at the usage of colons and commas in quotations and critics since those have been a problem in the past and I'm not sure if are used properly.--Gunt50 (talk) 16:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I've made one pass through the article. I'm a little leery about the numerous role details; is it really necessary to have them for so many films? Clarityfiend (talk) 12:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * You raised an interesting point here. Me and the other user detailed the numerous role details since the last time the article failed its FA nomination because it had some refs' inconsistency issues and was not comprehensive enough. Some roles that ain't that relevant are explained in the article. We were thinking of trimming details but we'll be careful since we don't want to repeat the last nomination's mistakes. Do you have a particular opinion about parts that should be trimmed/removed?--Gunt50 (talk) 14:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * After looking it over again, it's not quite as bad as I thought. I'd get rid of "set in the late 1950s, in which she played the part of Eleanor, one of three daughters of the town millionaire, Lloyd Abbott" since it isn't referenced in Ron Howard's comments; the one sentence plot description of The House of Sand and Fog; and "a mentally unstable woman who has a 20-year affair with the local sheriff, whose daughter then starts a relationship with Virginia's son". I'd also like to delete the plot summary of Salvation Boulevard, but that would leave a one sentence paragraph. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: The Circus

 * These are the role designations as phrased and capitalized in the TCM version's credits

I'm glad someone is doing such a good job verifying the content, but I think you're taking this a bit too literally. Check out MOS:FILM to see how we write cast sections or refer to any FA-Class film article for guidance. Wikipedia has its own house style, and we will often modify or change the case of a word to fit that house style, especially when we are dealing with a silent film from 1928. I mean, can you think of a single good reason to spell Tramp as TRAMP? No, of course not. Viriditas (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, again. I reverted your change of the see also section. This has been discussed extensively on the talk page (see the archives) and on multiple noticeboards.  The consensus was to leave the link in as simply "George Clarke's time travel urban legend" and not to expand upon it. If you want further clarification on this widely discussed problem, let me know. Viriditas (talk) 00:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing a consensus (just a lot of head scratching), so I've made a proposal on the talk page. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, are you joking? Please tell me you are.  This particular issue has been discussed ad nauseum and has had a record number of comments devoted to it. There's a strong consensus in those discussions and on the talk page to keep the link as it is.  Because I anticipated that a user like yourself might try to reopen this closed discussion, you can find a documented summary of the consensus listed over at User:Viriditas/Circus_consensus.  I think this is a closed subject and should remain so unless new information is offered for discussion.  This topic has been discussed from every conceivable angle, and quite honestly, there is nothing left to discuss. Viriditas (talk) 00:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * My, my, my. You and Jack Sebastian have vented a lot of spleen on each other, haven't you? And now you appear to want to pick a fight with me with your snide remarks. "a user like yourself"? What the hell is that supposed to mean?


 * I saw a bare see also link with no explanation of its connection to the article and tried to remedy it. Then you brought up a long history of your bitter argument about whether the theory/claim should be included in the article. You're tossing apples at my oranges. Seriously, what's your problem? Clarityfiend (talk) 01:59, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You are reading things into this that don't exist. "A user like yourself" refers to anyone who isn't familiar with the discussion and consensus on this topic.  The dispute originated with Jack and several editors, including Slatersteven and ScottyBerg.  My attention and involvement began much later, when their dispute finally reached ANI, at which point I offered my opinion there and began following it more closely.  Feel free to ask any questions if this is not clear. Viriditas (talk) 03:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've skimmed through most of the vast reams of wrangling, but what I've read doesn't really bear on the fact that there's an odd link without a description. Regardless, I've learned a lesson from my previous dealings with another editor with, ahem, strong opinions. If you don't understand where I'm coming from, I'm not going to waste any more of my time on what is, in the end, a minor blemish. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning towards agreement. My opinion, however, is that there should not be any see also link.  During discussion, we arrived at that link by consensus.  So, I understand your intent and sympathize with your position.  Can you propose an alternative somewhere between removing it and your recent edit? Viriditas (talk) 04:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope. My suggestion on The Circus talk page is about as concise as it gets. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I wish it was that easy! For example, some editors refer to it as an urban legend and others as a meme.  Personally, I don't think it is even notable to include per WP:ONEWAY.  "George Clarke's time travel urban legend" is a compromise.  Your proposal to add "A time travel urban legend involving a clip from this film" is reasonable now that I understand your intent.  I will add it back. Viriditas (talk) 05:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I hope the modified version is acceptable to you. Viriditas (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I tried. Viriditas (talk) 06:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oy vey. The sleeping dog has awoken. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The MOS has little bearing on the format. If there were more background info, then "well-written prose" could be added, but there isn't in this case. I dithered a bit on the TRAMP, but left it in all-caps because Chaplin was credited last, and I figured this was his way of showing who had top billing. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:48, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You'll notice I didn't revert those changes, as I think one can make a good argument for keeping them. However, considering the stylized format of film credits in 1928, I think one can also make a good argument for formatting them in Wikipedia house style, which is why I left them in the previous format. Viriditas (talk) 00:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your good work on The Circus. I hope you are able to turn it into a good article! Viriditas (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I'm that ambitious, but at least we've resolved the see also brouhaha. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

A request
Hi, Clarityfiend, how are you? Since you've done such a great job by copy-editing Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná I was wondering if you would have the interest on doing the same in Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias. I want to nominate it to FAC but I must be sure that the article has a good prose. Do not feel obliged to do this if you're not interested. I won't be upset. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Clarityfiend, are you done with the article? --Lecen (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've been through it once, but will probably give it one more pass at some point. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm done. I've replaced some first names w/ last (Eusébio -> de Queirós, and Paulino -> de Sousa). If this isn't right, go ahead and change them back. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you do me another favor and take a look at the last section ("Legacy") of Honório Carneiro Leão, Marquis of Paraná and see if it's ok? I erased a lot of sentences from it to focus more on him and less on the elctoral reform he ennacted. I made no change to any sentence, but I believe it would be good to see if there is anything wrong. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Toward the Unknown
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   08:03, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Researcher's Barnstar

 * Thanks, though it was hardly a lot of work. I was practically tripping over the myriad sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Shall I redact the barnstar? (LOL) What you did was something I would have happily done myself if not involved elsewhere, and addressing adressable issues is always worth a pat on the back. I just thought this needed more than a cookie. [[Image:Smiley.svg|20px]]  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Vicious (Rapper from Lake Charles, LA)
I had added Vicious to the list of people with the name Vicious. He is a rapper out of Lake Charles, LA. He is not as active as he once was, but still has significant noteriety. I do not appreciate you deleting him from the list. I have no problem with you adding the other Rapper named Vicious, but you should not have deleted Vicious from Lake Charles just because you have never heard of him. His songs are readily available on the internet and in music stores. I am not a top contributor to wikipedia, as you are, so I do not have the experience to create a whole page for Vicious from Lake Charles. I only added his name to the list, because I was interested in reading about him and saw that there was no article. Adding his name was the first step and I was hoping someone else would come along and create the page. You added a nice page on the rapper Vicious from Jamaica, but should not have deleted the other Rapper Vicious from the list of names. Please explain to me why this was done. Thanks, Jesse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesseboud (talk • contribs) 17:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've put him back. Music's not my strong point, but it's possible he may be notable enough for his own article. I'll leave that for somebody else with more knowledge to judge. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Twernt nothin'. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Season's greetings to you too. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For your work on Decommissioning of Russian nuclear-powered vessels

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC) <br style="clear: both"/>
 * Spasiba. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Adam And Evelyne (film)
All references to Evelyne are not correct. This is plainly evident by the movie poster that is shown on the wiki page which shows the correct title as being "Adam And Evalyn". My attempt to correct the errors were feeble in that I never tried it before.

Sincerely, HawkOfDC — Preceding unsigned comment added by HawkOfDC (talk • contribs) 19:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Here's a Youtube clip of the opening credits, plainly showing the title is Adam and Evelyne. The Guardian obituary of Simmons calls the film the same thing, as do IMDb, TCM and AllRovi. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:41, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Aah. Adam and Evalyn is the US title, but since it's a British film, Evelyne takes precedence. My apologies for labeling it vandalism. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Merry Christmas for you!
Hi, Clarityfiend! How're doing? I'm not here to bother you this time with boring copy-editing! I'd like to wish you a Merry Christmas. Thank you very much for all your help, I'm really grateful. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Season's greetings to you too. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:35, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Season's tidings!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC).


 * It's worth a ho-ho-hole lot. Happy holidays to you. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes, seriously, for "Storm in a Teacup (film)"
I haven't Wikilinked the title yet because I proposed a deletion. I couldn't find significant coverages and sources not affiliated with this topic to meet general notability guidelines for this film. It cannot be notable just as a film starring two major stars and Rex Harrison's first film. There has to be more than that, and any existing reviews are too insufficient to help this topic meet GNG. --George Ho (talk) 22:40, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh... almost forgot, this film may meet WP:notability (film) if it otherwise does not meet GNG. I could not find anything that may meet "Other evidence of notability"; even if it does, this film's notability may not guarantee a stand-alone article. --George Ho (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Congrats
Hello C. I just want to drop a note of thanks and congratulations for your work on the Confessions of a Cheat article. I was especially impressed with your being able to distill the intricate storyline of the film into an understandable plot section. When I first discovered this director (through the Eclipse DVD box set) I described him to friends as someone who was breaking the rules of cinema three years before Orson Welles. Cheers and have a great 2012 on wiki and off. MarnetteD | Talk 21:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merci. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)