User talk:ClarkMills

License tagging for Image:Tps cross 3.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Tps cross 3.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 08:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Arduino
You recently removed a deadlink from this article, but it was cited to an award. May I ask that you revert your removal, and tag it with deadlink instead? At least that way, the cite to the award will remain and maybe an archive can be found somewhere. Yngvarr (t) (c) 19:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Pinball-DoctorWho-TopperDalek.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pinball-DoctorWho-TopperDalek.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pef backer


The article Pef backer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  333-blue  at 02:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mirror cut-off


The article Mirror cut-off has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced since 2007"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of PEF rod for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PEF rod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PEF rod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 13:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)