User talk:Clarksmom

LunarX
Hello Clarksmom, you might be interested in my comment here: --Edoe (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk:Google_Lunar_X_Prize

Did you read the comments on the GLXP talk page before reverting? You are trying to reinsert uncited opinion, which is not in adherence with Wikipedia guidelines. Please discuss on the article talk page. Thank you. Arjuna (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crowbar (tool) was changed by Clarksmom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954252 on 2012-02-13T13:16:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Crowbar (tool) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for disruptive editing on Crowbar (tool). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crowbar (tool) was changed by Clarksmom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97267 on 2012-02-25T04:52:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Backgammon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 15:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crowbar (tool) was changed by Clarksmom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953158 on 2012-04-03T03:13:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crowbar (tool). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 07:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Crowbar (tool), you may be blocked from editing. Allens (talk &#124; contribs) 03:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Federal Housing Finance Agency, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Crowbar (tool). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * One more crowbar joke, one more disruptive edit, and your account will be blocked indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 02:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Chaz Bono
I saw this edit first. "Wow," I said to myself, "Someone has added an insulting comment to the talk page. That's pretty inappropriate.  I can assume good faith, though; maybe she doesn't realize that this is inappropriate.  Or maybe I'm wrong, and this actually is an important area to discuss." So, assuming good faith, I searched google news for the information you said was one of the most widely written-out aspects of Bono's life, and I found nothing. So, probably meant to be insulting, then, and not a well-intentioned attempt to make the article better. Then I looked at your talk page, and noticed that you had been repeatedly warned to stop making inappropriate edits, and in fact, had been warned that your next inappropriate edit would result in an indefinite block. However, looking at your edits, I suspect that, despite your name, you are probably a child or a teenager, and thus likely to learn, in time, to do good research writing. So instead of an indefinite block, I made the block for one year. Please feel free to come back, and make useful edits, when you have a better ability to do that. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

List of distributed computing projects
I recently started a discussion regarding whether dead projects should be removed from the List of distributed computing projects. Since I see you've contributed to that article in the past, I would be grateful if you would throw in your two cents. Thanks! – voidxor (talk &#124; contrib) 05:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)