User talk:Claudia vdH

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 00:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Nordmann, Rassmann GmbH.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! –Mabeenot (talk) 05:14, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Nordmann, Rassmann GmbH
I'm not sure why you posted a question in my old sandbox page and I don't know what a "doublicat" is. If you're referring to the article you posted at Articles for Creation, there are two nearly identical versions of your article posted here and here. Neither version has addressed the concern SarahStierch raised when you first submitted the article. The subject of the article needs to be the focus of significant coverage by reliable, independent sources in order to show that the subject is notable enough to have an entry in an encyclopedia. See Wikipedia's guidelines on notability and reliable sources for more details. When you have improved the article, you may resubmit it for review by another editor by adding another AfC template to the page. –Mabeenot (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please leave messages on my talk page rather than the sandbox. You have two copies of the same article posted at AfC, one on the talk page and one on the article side (see the links in my previous message). Pick one and remove the other. Furthermore, you have still not addressed SarahStierch's concerns from before. To reiterate, the subject of the article needs to be the focus of significant coverage by reliable, independent sources in order to show that the subject is notable enough to have an entry in an encyclopedia. –Mabeenot (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has guidelines for what can and cannot be included in this free encyclopedia. This is not a place to promote your business nor is it a directory of every corporation in the world. The company's website is not an independent source. Lists of the top 100 chemical distributors are not significant coverage. Please read the notability guidelines and what constitutes a reliable source. If significant coverage does not exist for this subject, the subject may not be notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. You may also benefit from reading about what Wikipedia is not. –Mabeenot (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)