User talk:Claudiajeancregg2000

Welcome!
Hi Claudiajeancregg2000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 14:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ryan's Daughter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. The Banner talk 20:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Don't add bogus embedded notes
Don't add bogus embedded notes as you did here. There is no discussion on that article's talk page about the wording of how the subject killed himself. Many journalistic sources prefer "died by suicide" as it avoid stigmatising a suicide victim, since "committed suicide" is laden with the ascription of a Catholic sin. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm ProcrasinatingReader. I noticed that in this edit to List of awards and nominations received by Kevin Costner, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 13:54, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rithvik Dhanjani, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note also that we use DMY dates for Indian subjects, so the correct formatting of the birth date and age template would be YYYY where "df=yes" triggers the day to appear first. This would be the appropriate formatting. And for the written out date, "born 5 November 1988" would be correct. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Bancroft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Home for the Holidays ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anne_Bancroft check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anne_Bancroft?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sushant Singh Rajput, you may be blocked from editing. ''Diff: As previously noted, no conversation has been held on the talk page where a consensus was built about the phrasing of the subject's death. Your assertion that it has, and your mandate that it not be changed, is therefore erroneous and indistinguishable from vandalism. If you make this change again without establishing a proper consensus, your editing privileges will be interrupted.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Alia Bhatt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. regentspark (comment) 20:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Re: File:Allison-janney-at-29th-annual-palm-springs-international-film-festival-awards-gala-01-02-2018-8.jpg, do not upload images and claim them as being licensed in the Creative Commons if you cannot prove that they are actually licensed that way. There is nothing at the content-scraping website hawtcelebs.com that would lead us to think they own the copyright on that image, and there's nothing clearly marked as in the Creative Commons.

Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously. If you do it again, your editing privileges will be pulled. You're already on thin ice for your recent disruptions, including the clear vandalism at Alia Bhatt. If you're not willing to learn our copyright policy, then don't upload images. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Claudia, since I'm contemplating whether or not you need to be blocked for copyright violations, what is your answer to the question above? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Since you haven't bothered to respond, if you are not willing to follow our copyright policies, you shouldn't attempt to upload images, since you may find yourself violating copyright laws. If you are interested in uploading images, you need to be familiar with our policies, including WP:NFCC, and you need to make sure you don't add any more erroneously licensed images. Frankly, if I were you, I'd steer clear of it. Any more copyright violations, and that includes mis-appropriating text found on other websites, will result in your editing privileges being interrupted.Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Allison Janney.   ☾Loriendrew☽   ☏(ring-ring)  15:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Resolve the copyright violation issue before reintroducing the image

I have changed her Wikipedia profile picture to most recent one (from 2018 with the current one from 2008) The 2018 picture has been approved an not removed as of now Claudiajeancregg2000 (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It has not been "approved". You claimed the image was in the Creative Commons, which appears to be inaccurate, as far as I can tell, since you haven't answered my query above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Comment from IP 92.11.225.141
Hi , I just want to know why you wrote on Sushant Singh Rajput page that it's a suicide by hanging...

Do you have any proof? Don't tell us about so called doctors report....

Kindly don't write anything which you don't know. Thanks dear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.225.141 (talk) 07:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

I just assume that's how you address when someone takes there own life Claudiajeancregg2000 (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Brie Larson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Woodroar (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Make another blatantly false edit like this one, and you will be reported. Grandpallama (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madame Tussauds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain Marvel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Madame_Tussauds check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Madame_Tussauds?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Jodie Foster, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Crboyer (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 15:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation again?
Can you please explain why here I find the same phrasing as here? Please note that I expect a reasonable answer about this, otherwise, your editing privileges are going to be interrupted again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:RDX451&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/RDX451. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)