User talk:Claus at Name Defend DE

October 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at India Against Corruption. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. However, my edit is a constructive edit to uphold a core policy of the Wikimedia Foundation's "Terms of Use" - to prevent impersonation of the named organisation. The controversial deleted text was inserted by another paid editor "Sitush", against whom the affected organisation has very recently filed a criminal complaint in India, including for impersonating a History graduate from Peters House / Cambridge University so as to mislead the Wikipedia community and pose as an authority. Claus at Name Defend DE (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sitush is not a paid editor. We've gone through this many times. Dougweller (talk) 12:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at India Against Corruption shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 12:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for legal threats, and block evasion as a probable sockpuppet of User talk:Name Defend IPA. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Euryalus (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC) @Admin:Euryalus I have emailed you, as there are issues pertaining to the author of these falsehoods. Claus at Name Defend DE (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)