User talk:Clawraich (Dalek)

Welcome!
Hello, Clawraich (Dalek), and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --DrWho42 (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Mylo Xyloto, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 123.136.112.178 (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to OneRepublic
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, OneRepublic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Counting Stars, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 22:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Internal stakeholder


A tag has been placed on Internal stakeholder, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - IN VISIBLE knock! 10:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Every Night (Imagine Dragons song)
Per WP:NSONG, most songs are not notable. There are clear criteria for which songs might be notable. This song does not reach that. As such, a redirect to the album's article is common. A couple of side notes:
 * The article was clearly a stub (very short, consisting of a only general description).
 * In song articles, we cannot use an image of the album, per WP:NFCC. The album cover is automatically copyrighted. Copyrighted images may be used in a very specific set of cases. In general, the image cannot be replaceable (such as a copyrighted photo of a living person) and must be identifying. The album's cover is clearly identifying for an article about the album and cannot be replaced by a different image. For a song, an image of the album does not specifically identify the song. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Color Wheel
Hello Dalek. I've added a section to "Talk:Color wheel", commenting about your recent edit on "Color wheel" - where you added "(u)"s to the word "color" in the first line. I appreciate your intent, but don't agree with its point ... seems unwieldy, plus it goes against WP:COFAQ. Anyway, I have no interest in getting into an edit war over it and hopefully other editors will chime in. - Xenxax (talk) 17:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC) --What about i do Color/colour wheel & color/colour circle? I'll do that and you let me know what you think.

February 2017
Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Computer-aided design— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello. Your recent edit to October 22 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at June 28. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)