User talk:Cleanupcrew2

January 2018
Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Anitere Flores. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please discuss on talk page to achieve consensus before removing again. RA 0808  talkcontribs 18:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

"The information that you considered topically relevant is incorrect. There have been no mentions of a sexual affair therefore making the information slander." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleanupcrew2 (talk • contribs)

Please read the policies explained to you above and take your concerns to the article talk page as opposed to blanking reliably-sourced content. Even if you disagree with the use of the word "sexual", which is explicitly used in the source, the only argument you would have would be for the removal of that single word, not the entire section. Your username doesn't provide any assurances that you are able to edit neutrally and collaboratively.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Anitere Flores— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Warning regarding three-revert rule
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Conflicts of interest
Hello, Cleanupcrew2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Anitere Flores, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''It is clear that you have a conflict of interest with regard to the subject and it is imperative that you use the article talk page to suggest edits as opposed to editing the article directly moving forward. If it becomes clear that your sole purpose in editing Wikipedia is to promote Ms. Flores, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for abuse of multiple accounts
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You cannot create additional accounts to continue violating Wikipedia policies.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)