User talk:Cleduc/Archive3

Re:RFC on Luisosio's conduct
I'm not sure why I was informed of this RFC; to my knowledge I've never had dealings with the editor in question, nor have I edited the articles mentioned in the RFC (unless it was a vandalism-type reversion). Additionally, I don't really have any experience in RFC so I'm not sure how I can help. Precious Roy 13:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Guess I should've checked further before writing. I now see that I reverted an edit of his while I was patrolling recent changes. I made a judgement call in that case based on what I saw happening; I still feel, however, unqualified to comment in the RFC. Precious Roy 13:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

RFC
Thanks for starting the RFC. I've never been involved in one before. Should I do something besides just signing my name? Basically the only thing I'd say that you didn't is that Luisoso seems to learn Wikipedia jargon but doesn't learn the Wiki principles (like accusing people of vandalism or violating NPOV all the time). Katsam 21:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * So if nobody else comments on the RfC, is that sort of the end of it?Katsam 07:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

In Remembrance...
--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Statross le Magnifique
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Statross le Magnifique, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. B. Wolterding 17:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Statross le Magnifique
Hi, Cleduc! Yes, I did look at the picture - lasciviously, even! However, if a film is LGBT-related, it really should be stated somewhere in the article - otherwise we're leaving it up to WP:OR. Surely there are tons of sources for a plot summary or something that would expand the article *and* say why it's in the LGBT cat? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * ROTFL! And here I am telling you "More gay!" :)  BTW, have you considered joining the cabal WP:LGBT?  Take a look around, and if you are, sign up :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)  02:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow - Liza 'and' Kathy!? You're really earning the shiny pink stars! :)
 * And, just to be official:

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 20:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Giano
Classic vote! We should all be afraid...very afraid. Tex17:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)