User talk:Clemson3564

South Carolina State Parks
I got your message. I saw your infobox template for state parks. I tried it out on the Oconee Station State Historic Site. Unlike many templates, it displays the row for items that have no data entry. With no campsites at Oconee Station, the row for camping still appeared also with other rows. I did not include it in the editing -- but some pictures have been added.

The source information for the parks would appear to be just the DNR website. Without pictures, such as the one you used at Oconee State Park, the websites would look pretty sparse. KudzuVine 22:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I like that the picture is in the template, but can we also add the SC Map image with the red dot on each park? I just wrote an article for Harrisville State Park in Michigan, and that template allows the MI Map with the red dot on Harrisville State Park, but no image of the park itself in the template. Seems to me they should have both (but if I had to choose I'd choose the state map with the red dot and put images of the park in the body of the article). Incidentally, I was bold and overhauled the WikiProject South Carolina page. There must not be many interested members, because no one's said a word. I've been watching the page for a while and there is a very low level of activity. Best, MoodyGroove 15:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove

SC State Parks Navbox
I revamped your template and posted it on the SC state parks pages. I hope you like it! - Jirt 18:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on SC State Parks Navigation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.137.12.148 15:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Scprtlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Scprtlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject College football December 2007 Newsletter
The December 2007 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject College football January 2008 Newsletter
The January 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football February 2008 Newsletter
The February 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Invite
Jccort (talk) 03:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cjspiller.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cjspiller.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * Image:Cjspillerwakeforest.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Easleyseal.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Easleyseal.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I have three questions
I made an edit today--one edit--to the article Carrie Prejean and have not made an edit to the article in days, but yet another editor reversed my ONE edit and then reported me on the 3RR notice board. I find this to be a clear use of Wikipedia to win a debate about article content and direction. Prejean was called a series of negative things by Perez Hilton, most of the words are contemptuous and vile, such as the b-word and c-word. There are editors that believe that each and every one of Hilton's use of those words MUST be included in the article about Prejean. Now, I don't see the need to have an article about Prejean dominated by the words and comments of ONE individual (highly negative words at that) dominate the life story of Prejean. It is tantamount to having the words of Saddam Hussein concerning George W Bush dominate the Wikipedia article about Bush. It violates Wikipedia avowed goal of NPOV and it violates BLP. Now, I know that consensus in Wikipedia editing is one of the goals, but consensus does NOT override other valid Wikipedia ideals such as BLP. There can be a compromise made where the gist of Hilton's highly negative opinion is included in the article, but at the same time it does NOT dominate the life story of Prejean. Prejean is notable for many, many reasons, not just her public fight with Hilton. She is notable for being a successful model; she is notable for participating in Deal or No Deal; she is notable for being the current Miss California USA; and she is now notable for being a TV personality. My first question is: Can you at least review the article and see if the second, third, fourth, and fifth repetitions of the b-word and c-word violates BLP? I believe that it does. And my second question is: Is it appropriate to make a report on an editor for violating 3RR even though that editor has only made one edit? And my third question is: Is misusing 3RR to win a debate on the proper interpretation of BLP appropriate? I don't think so.--InaMaka (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

College Football Project request
Hello! You are listed as an active member of the College Football Project! We have a large number of unreferenced biographies of living persons, but it works out to be just two or three articles per active participant. I've divided up the articles that need help and put them in a table on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Unreferenced BLPs. Please assist the project by researching and sourcing the articles that have been "assigned" (so to speak) to you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject South Carolina
Template:WikiProject South Carolina has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012

 * —  Imzadi 1979  →   21:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

New Wikipedia User
Hi, I'm a student at Clemson University and just started using Wikipedia for an English project. I need to find some Wikipedia users to read over my article and give some feedback and I was wondering if you wouldn't mind doing so. My article is on the Charleston Tea Plantation. Thank you. Ballerina311 (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Backpacking
Please consider returning to the project. —philoserf (talk) 02:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)