User talk:Cleo120/sandbox

Article Selection Tara https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tara_(Buddhism)

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Is it written neutrally? Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable? 1.) Info missing about the other backgrounds Tara comes from. 2.) Yes its of a neutral tone. 3.) Yes each claim is cited. 4.) Yes all reliable sources.

Muses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muses

Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Is it written neutrally? Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable? 1.) I feel as if the articles content isn't revolved around the myth of the actual muses just what they represented. 2.) Yes it's written neutrally. 3.) Where one is needed yes. 4.) Some are. Ra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ra Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Is it written neutrally? Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable? 1.) More needs to be added to the article. 2.)Written in a neutral tone. 3.) Yes each claim is cited. 4.) Sorta some seem unreliable sources.


 * Cleo120 all good choices, but I'd lean toward either Muses or Ra, since Tara is more 'religion' than 'mythology'. Make sure to work in your sandbox instead of your sandbox's talk page (come see me if that doesn't make sense)! Gardneca (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Good citation work, but take a look at citation 1, it's empty (I think you just didn't enter the information correctly). Otherwise, excellent job so far! Gardneca (talk) 02:10, 29 March 2019 (UTC)