User talk:Clesam11

Welcome. Legacypac (talk) 09:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Q&A
Greetings! Feel free to ask me questions or brief me on the happenings of Wikipedia below! Thank you!

NZ election polling article
Not a problem, you may wish to change the electorate polling for consistency as well. Sleepingstar (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for the notifications on Wikimedia Commons, but as you have already figured out, I don't really mind to be honest. (Once one puts anything onto wikipedia, it is bound to be edited and reproduced anyway, which is part for the whole wiki philosophy). 06:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleepingstar (talk • contribs)

Copyright
Note that I've deleted the photo taken from the Japan Times. Do not help yourself to photos that are not freely licensed - this is a copyright infringement.  Schwede 66  06:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

"Next"
In your edit summary you stated "like other election articles", well other articles state the year instead of "next". Or when you meant by "other", do you mean by PM elections instead of presidential elections? Typhoon2013 (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 00:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * There is no justification for banning me at all. My edit is completely legitimate and is being removed without any explanation. I have reached out to you on the talk page to explain why you think it should be removed and you will not participate in a discussion. We are both in an edit it war, and on the intellectual side of it, you are losing. Clesam11 (talk) 00:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 00:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Next New Zealand general election
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Image of Ardern
Here to say thanks for adjusting the crop of the image of Ardern. Looks much better. TravisD (talk) 09:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks and no problem! Clesam11 (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Licensing
You seem to have ongoing issues with licensing of files. Rather than make rules up yourself, I suggest you read the official policy. Granted, it's a complicated topic, but there's no way round knowing what it is that you can and can't do with files.  Schwede 66  08:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I assumed that a file that allows sharing and altering as long as it was not for commercial purposes would be appropriate for wikipedia without double checking the rules. To be fair, that is quite confusing - but I will take a lot more care from now on. Clesam11 (talk) 09:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Next New Zealand general election
OK on your reversion of my edit. On my iPad, the table was so wide that it resulted in compression of the text sections to much less than the full width of the screen. Perhaps that didn't show for users with laptops/desktops. I believed I had fixed it, but the lower table also caused the same problem. I left it at that point, unsure whether to adjust it too. Anyway, am satisfied with the revert, even though it's horrible on my iPad. Akld guy (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry to hear that. My S5 and iPad have no trouble scrolling horizontally across wikitables and they look fine on my end. Are you sure your iOS and browser are both updated to their most recent versions? If it keeps happening for you with everything up to date then i'd be cool with finding a way to make it look tidy while also being less wide. Clesam11 (talk) 02:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This iPad is the original version that came out years ago; a hand-me-down from my sister. No updates since about 2012 because of no support, but it does things remarkably well except for the occasional oddity. A later version iPad has been offered to me and it should be in my hands next week. Akld guy (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

NZ polling graphs
Hey there,

It was too hard for the longest time to fix the old nz polling graph, but I had a bit of go tonight. I'm pretty agnostic, but you should definitely weigh in



Limegreen (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi,

The graph is looking great! I heavily prefer the smoothed trendline in comparison to the 2-point moving one in my graph. Only thing i'm wondering is if there's any way we can change the colours of the trendlines to be more defined and accurate to their real parties colours? Or is it stuck taking the colours directly off the wikitable? Either way, if you'd like to replace the current graph with this one i'm all for it! Clesam11 (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Somewhat ridiculously, I had the colours manually set, but as I was testing my scripting skills, I set it to take the colours off the table. I'll revert the colours, get rid of the +/- INF and upload. Cheers, and thanks for keeping the graphs there in the interim. Limegreen (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey,
 * No trouble at all! Glad to have your graph back in service! Clesam11 (talk) 10:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Update graph request
Hi, just here to ask if you can please update a graph you made. Polls have been added on 2020 New Zealand cannabis referendum since the last update from March 2019, March 2020, and two from June 2020.



All the best. Helper201 (talk) 06:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Polling dates
Hi and thanks for filling in the polling dates for the recent Roy Morgan poll. Just for future references, where do you find the polling dates as I could not find them in the article. Thanks so much. Typhoon2013 (talk) 02:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:52nd New Zealand Parliament
Template:52nd New Zealand Parliament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)