User talk:Clg0107

Speedy deletion of Fans4writers
A tag has been placed on Fans4writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Rjd0060 (talk) 17:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fans4writers
Fans4writers, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Fans4writers satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Fans4writers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Fans4writers during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Rjd0060 (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Ron Moore
Well for a start, if you go back and read the paragraph you edited, your edits didn't actually make sense. The whole paragraph is talking about his new blog. It didn't really read right with the little addition you tagged on the end.

Aside from that I'm not sure how significant thirty forum postings are. I believe he's been a regular poster in other forums, where he has left significantly more postings that are counted in the hundreds, possibly thousands. AlistairMcMillan 21:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)