User talk:Clgarner1997/Chinese white shrimp/NicoleFipps Peer Review

Peer Review
The Lead: I feel like the introductory section is pretty good. I imagine that this was already there beforehand, but I think it is a good starting place. It talks about the shrimp's previous names and classifications so I think that is an opportunity to discuss the history of the organism. It also talks about epidemics that I would be interested to know more about so that could be an interesting section for discussion as well. Definitely add a little more to it though, don't just leave it how it is. Once you have written the other sections, anything you dont reference in the lead section that you include in the body could be a sentence or two that you could add to the lead.

Structure: Right now your structure is good. I might would suggest talking about the organisms habitat, distribution, food resources, etc. before you talk about conservation though.

Balance: There isn't really enough information here for me to comment on balance, but like I said, I don't think it is necessary to talk about conservation in the beginning when you havent discussed the main details of the organism. Talk about all aspects of the organism you can find information on and then go into conservation efforts.

Neutrality: I do think, with what you have right now, you maintain a neutral tone.

Sources: It looks like you have only found one source yourself. I think the best thing for you to do would be to compile a list of sources about our organism to see what information is really known about it and then go from there. Obviously if there isn't a lot said on their habitat then you shouldn't make that an entire section. You need 12 sources, so I would say fill out your bibliography and then build from there. It does look like the source you did find is a reliable journal article so try to search for more of those!

NicoleFipps (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)