User talk:Clickworld

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. In particular, you need a very good reason for the wholesale removal of cited content, and its substitution with copied and pasted sections from other articles. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Haploidavey (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

January 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Just for reference for the reviewing admin - (who reported Clickworld to aiv). Syrthiss (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * And just a quick message to Clickworld on the matter. Your description of some of your edits as "non-vandalism" implies your full awareness that others were vandalistic, yet you didn't attempt to fix the damage. Bona fide editing tests and errors are one thing, but when an editor makes such a rapid-fire sequence of unconstructive edits, administrators can use discretion in imposing a block. This allows administrators to limit damage to encyclopedia articles, and gives blocked editors time to reconsider their actions. If I were an admin, I'd have blocked you myself. Haploidavey (talk) 15:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It certainly is within the policy to block someone without warning to protect further damage to the project, especially when the damage being performed is significant. It's like if I saw you throwing rocks at someone's house, I don't have to ask nicely to stop before taking the rocks from your hand. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 15:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

I understand why I was blocked, and I know I deserved it, but this is my only account. Clickworld (talk) 15:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)