User talk:ClifV

Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Ijeffsc. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Further thoughts:


 * 1) If CheckUser found a connection between the previously mentioned IP edits and User:Ijeffsc, then it is evidence that User:Ijeffsc has committed the WP:LOUTSOCK violation (likewise for a relationship between User:Ijeffsc and User:ClifV in respect to WP:BADSOCK)[i.]. If CheckUser found no connection between Ijeffsc and the IP edits, but did find a connection between the IP edits and User:ClifV, all that's been confirmed is that a person (me) made IP edits prior to registering as User:ClifV.
 * 2) My assessment of my obligation to connect my username to my IP edits, and presumed wrongdoing in failure to do so, was far more rigorous than the reality: "To protect their privacy, editors who have edited while logged out are never required to connect their usernames to their IP addresses on-wiki" and "If you have concerns that an IP editor is actually a user with an account who is editing while logged out in a way that is inappropriate, you can give the IP editor notice of this policy".
 * 3) Given that that ship has obviously sailed, I would like to state clearly that I give permission for information obtained by CheckUser on the activity of User:ClifV to be released, per the privacy policy which "requires that identifying information not be disclosed except... with the permission of the affected user". I understand that I am prohibited from making CheckUser requests for myself, and additionally cannot mandate that the information in question be released.
 * 4) User:Ijeffsc appears to be active again. Maybe we can all talk this out?
 * [i.] If either was the case, why was the responsible party/connection between the two named accounts left unconfirmed in the appeal rejection, and the new allegation of WP:LOUTSOCK applied to User:ClifV?


 * I'm crying out for some skepticism here.
 * ClifV (talk) 00:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello User:Ijeffsc, I'm tracking. ClifV (talk) 03:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Mr. Timepiece Goes To Washington
Hello again User:Ijeffsc. To any interested parties, I contacted Ijeffsc off wiki via email (post-block, of course). I'm making this edit simultaneous to his to confirm that we are, in fact, not the same person. ClifV (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Imagine_sisyphus_happy.png
 * Conversation on synchronization of and my previous message is shown to the left. Time was synchronized with https://clock.zone/. At the time of the conversation we were approximately 14,500km/9,000mi apart, give or take a few k. ClifV (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Unblock Request
ClifV (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)