User talk:Climatepedia

September 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

❌

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. McSly (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

❌
 * You inserted an obviously false "hoax" tag on a solidly sourced article, based on a "citation" to a YouTube video from some rando fringe commentator. That's disruption. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  14:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Important notice
DanCherek (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive and tendentious editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Salvio 14:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I requested an unblock by saying "I didn't do disruptive editing as the hypothesis that humans cause climate change contradicts common sense and the laws of physics" but it was declined because I'm allegedly not here to build an encyclopedia]] but the truth is that I am here to build an encyclopedia. Climatepedia (talk) 15:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * As you are blocked, you must make another unblock request. 331dot (talk) 15:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
You'll do better to explain why you were deliberately adding information you knew to be false and why we should trust you'll be constructive going forward. Furthermore, why did you repeatedly deny your deliberate disruptive editing, falsely claiming you were here to build an encyclopedia? Nothing here indicates what you plan to write about if unblocked, for example. --Yamla (talk) 20:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @User:Yamla
 * I was deliberately adding information I knew to be false because I was supporting the Creative Society. The reason I supported the Creative Society was because of their foundations: https://creativesociety.com/8-foundations-of-a-creative-society. The reason you should trust that I'll be constructive going forward is because I'll only add information that's neutral and attributed to reliable sources. If unblocked, I would probably edit articles at Portal:Climate change and Portal:Music. Climatepedia (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I oppose any edits involving climate change. Needs a WP:TOPICBAN. And we are supposed to believe they will suddenly become constructive? Dubious. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with Deepfriedokra. In general, I am a huge fan of WP:ROPE and, in principle, I'm not necessarily opposed to unblocking this user if we get believable assurances that he will edit constructively going forward. However, in the light of his edits so far and of the fact that the topic area is already fraught with disruption, I strongly oppose allowing Climatepedia to make any edits relating to climate change. Salvio 21:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * And I think they are begging the question of "why?" -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * excuse the necroposting but doing a bit of research says that this group he pushed is a known climate denial group, according to the bbc. Derpdart56 (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)