User talk:Clive Roux

Experiential Graphic Design
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Experiential Graphic Design, and it appears to be a substantial copy of https://segd.org/what-experiential-graphic-design.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Experiential Graphic Design
Hello Clive Roux,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Experiential Graphic Design for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC) A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Clive Roux, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It appears that you have added a link to an image on an external website to Signage, likely in an attempt to display that image on the page. For technical and policy reasons, it is not possible to use images from external websites on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:34, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from User:Clive Roux, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Clive. I'm sorry I  have had to  tag  several  of your  contributions for attention  from  other admins. However, we do have policies that  must  be strictly  adhered to. Other admins, who may  share my opinion, will  decide what  action  to  take. Regards, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Whisperback
17:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

An answer
Two ways. One is to do what you did before - just post it. The better way is to post it at User:Clive Roux/DRAFT]] and ask for advice. Most regular editors and admins will give opinions (costs nothing...) if asked nicely. Some are grumpy - just go elsewhere instead. Peridon (talk) 22:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 13:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Entro communications) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Entro communications.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 22:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Entro


The article Entro has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of significant coverage in independent sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

All I apologize if this article is not meeting the bar and would love to understand how to do that. Entro is the leading Design Firm in Canada and absolutely deserve to be listed on Wikipedia otherwise you would be misrepresenting the design profession in Canada. So the issue is on my side in not fully understanding how to write this article.

I am rewriting it for you

Proposed deletion of Entro


The article Entro has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non-notable small business."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Entro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Entro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Entro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)