User talk:Cll734t64232489

I have reverted your reverts on Operation Mockingbird. As the section you deleted says, this part of the article was based on editorial consensus, and a new consensus should be reached before change. Please respond with your arguments for a new consensus on the article's talk page, rather than unilaterally revising. Rgr09 (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gary Webb, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Clovermoss (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gary Webb. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 07:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Lei Feng
I notice you have reverted my edit to the Lei Feng article. What is the issue you find with the edit? A discussion on the article's talk page would be helpful in improving the article's quality. Rgr09 (talk) 12:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Moscow State Institute of International Relations
I notice you have reverted my copy edit to Moscow State Institute of International Relations. The article is written in unidiomatic English, which I was trying to improve. What was the issue that led you to revert my edit? Do you have a better solution to the poor quality of the English? Rgr09 (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)