User talk:Cllane4


 * }

Carpet
I've reverted your contributions to Carpet because it should only have a short summary of Turkish carpet. --Ronz (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I've done so again. Can you please respond? --Ronz (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. Let's continue this on the article talk page. --Ronz (talk) 20:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries
One thing that would help is if you started using edit summaries to give some explanation for your edits. --Ronz (talk) 04:20, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Will do. Cllane4 (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated failure to abide by WP:CIVIL policy, including in edit-summaries and comments on others' talk-pages, despite warnings here on your talk-page and in response to questions you posted on other pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 07:06, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Turkish carpet
Several editors believe your external links added to Turkish carpet do not meet the WP:EL criteria. Please do avoid edit warring, and rather discuss your proposed changes at the article talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I am an expert in this field, I am a article writing, education oriented contribitor, not a nit-picking "so called" editor whose aim appear to be strictly to engage in disruptive behaviour and exercise their ability to play junior editor. The list is not too long. (see any number of other articles), nor is it innapropriate. If you want high quality educators and experts in their perspective fields to contribute, I highly suggest quelling the ability of lay people to edit well researched articles. Cllane4 (talk) 08:09, 17 January 2012 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ELYES Cllane4 (talk) 08:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Expert editors might be a useful essay to read. It addresses the importance of contributions from experts in their fields but is clear that they do not get free rein or exemption from standard article guidelines and behavior rules. DMacks (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for incivility. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Turkey/Articles worth reading
I have undone your edit at Portal:Turkey/Articles worth reading. Although it's not made 100% clear there, the two lists of articles on that page are the top-quality "featured articles" and the next-best "good articles". The article you added doesn't yet belong in either list. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history at Turkish carpet shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. . --Ronz (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Turkish carpet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 06:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Note
Please do try to understand this: we do value your contributions and efforts to improve wikipedia. We are here to help. But. It is important to talk to other editors and respect their opinion. Several comments were posted on Talk:Turkish carpet, and it would be a good start to go there and start conversation. Boldly reverting other editors will simply result in a block of your account. Materialscientist (talk) 06:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I doubt that this editor will change if comments like this and this are any indication. He sees himself as the expert and every other editor is interfering in "his" article. I've been here long enough to know when an editor just doesn't get it.  freshacconci  talk talk  13:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Turkish carpet. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkish carpet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)