User talk:Cloakdeath/Archive 1

Poke
Do you have LinkedIn, out of curiosity? I couldn't find you when I ran a search. One of the Puzzle Pirates OM's dragged me into it, so now I'm trying to populate my lists... --ElizabethFong 20:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll have to ask: which OM? --Cloak&#39; 21:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Just answer me this, did it really hurt that bad when we squared off on my page that you needed a strong policy on personal attacks? Speaking for myself I don't care what people think. If they do think of me as an ignoramus, I'd want them to tell me straight up.


 * It didn't especially hurt. But it doesn't need to happen again. If you have anymore problems of any kind, please go here.

Don't you think that's kinda over the top? If you had like 100+ fans and an overflowing base of people using your talk page every day then there would be a reason for a 'praise page' and 'rant page'. Keep things simple my friend.


 * No, I need them, they're good.--Cloak&#39; 23:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, where do you get this "I am famous" stuff? Shimdidly 23:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Look, why do you keep going on at me, you had a break for a few months.
 * I wont stir you any longer, If I say I'm not famous, would you leave me alone?--Cloak&#39; 09:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, why did you lash out at me so much, the first time on the Zezima page, then on your talk page? I started off with an ironic insult, and you were like a machine. Really, I was surprised at the hate you had for me, at reading that I didn't want a Zezima article. Tell me why. Or get the random insult machine out again.--Cloak&#39; 09:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Because you ignorance is daunting and gets annoying after a while. I wasn't being a hater, but frustration did play a role when you were so taut with your premise of argument. I was trying to see what would happen if you got spanked in an argument. As I suspected when the heat went up, you didn't lose pride but backed down with a 1-liner to get the last word, thus maintaining pride and giving no heed to anything that opposes what your original ideas were. So basically I found that your personality is that of defending E-pride and a closed mind. Why are you even worth bothering with? I guess it's just amusing seeing how you choose to respond when I basically tell you what your going to do, thus prompting you to do something else. I guess I want to ultimately understand how stubborn you really are. Shimdidly 02:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Cloak, although I disagree about your 'Zezima' idea, I can tell you are intelligent. You mind telling me how to make a 'user page'? I can't figure it out... Bafu1234 09:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Apology
Looking back, I'd like to say sorry in behalf of the things I've said to you, Cloak, and the angst that I have professed. You can remove whatever I've said here on your talk page as you see fit, and I'll do the same for mine. I'll flatly admit that I was wrong for trying to go down on you so badly, and if there's ever going to be anyone giving in, it ought to be me.

Peace. Shimdidly 15:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Peace.--Cloak&#39; 16:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
I reverted someone who blanked your page. -- ROASTY TOAST  21:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Cloak&#39; 07:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Some help please.

 * I created a subsection on the article RuneScape for "notable users" as shown below:

Notable Users

Over the course of time, there have been several players in the game that have attained popularity. Some have created fansites that they associate with their RuneScape identity, while others simply stand out on the highscore system. Some of them include:

Zezima - Currently holds as the highest ranking player within the highscore system. He began playing between late June and early July year 2001. Zezima has participated in an interview on both tip.it and Rsforums. He and his friend created a website for one purpose among several to dispell many rumors that have circulated around about his character and status in real life. He had attained considerable popularity in both being the first player to attain 99 in every stat in the game, and maintaining the highest rank in the highscore system for a respectable amount of time. His name is featured on a t-shirt bearing the words, "I Pked Zezima." He is also noted in over a 1,000 videos on the popular free video sharing website YouTube. Due to this broad reputation, many rumors float around both within the game itself and other websites. The same person behind Zezima also used to play a game known as Triple Triad x, in which he was able to maintain a rank within the top four players.

W13 - Gained popularity for creating a well known fansite, namely Zybez. W13 also created RuneScape Community, a popular message board for the Runescape community gaining on average 225,594 hits per week. His name is briefly mentioned on a news update on the offical RuneScape site. He is characterized by an unequipted player wearing a yellow partyhat. His account was permanently banned, possibly from being stolen.


 * With no debate on the actual legitimacy of this section, I would like to understand the legitimacy of the arguments that have been used to remove it, and I quote:


 * "There are no reliable sources covering these notable players (indiscriminately compiled statistics don't count). Unless someone provides some sources to establish notability, the section should go. :::-Amarkov moo! 22:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed, we dont need unreferenced cruft - • The Giant Puffin • 20:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)"


 * Why did they mention "no reliable sources" ... "Unless someone provides some sources to establish notability" ... "we don't need unreferenced cruft"


 * How was this section unreferenced? I referenced the heck out of that section (as you can readily see).  Any way you can help me understand (what the heck) is going on, and why I was accused of not referencing the section (when I did), will be greatly appreciated, thank you for your time, Cloak.  Shimdidly 19:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Protected userpage
Given the high levels of vandalism to your userpage, I've semi-protected it for the next 2 weeks. Drop me a note if you want it unprotected before then. WjBscribe 21:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way- if you want me to delete the vandal revisions so those edit summaries don't show up in your page's history, I'm perfectly happy to do that. WjBscribe 21:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've now also protected this page. WjBscribe 21:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I thank you for protecting my user pages. If you could remove some edit summaries, that too, would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. --Cloak&#39; 19:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Have sprotected again. Orderinchaos 19:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. Also fixed edit summaries per your request above. Orderinchaos 19:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)