User talk:Clockworkfiction3

Glormo
A tag has been placed on Glormo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spuddock (talk) 22:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I've taken the Speedy Tag off, but Wikipedia isn't a dictionary, so it shouldn't really be an article. Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary Spuddock (talk) 23:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glormo
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Glormo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Spuddock (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)