User talk:Clonemann

Little context in MAKE AN ARTICLE
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on MAKE AN ARTICLE, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because MAKE AN ARTICLE is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting MAKE AN ARTICLE, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 09:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:A.N.B.U. mask.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A.N.B.U. mask.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spore.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Spore.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Afraid of Monsters
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Afraid of Monsters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unremarkable software

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tgies (talk) 06:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Afraid of Monsters
Clonemann,

I understand that your article is under construction. However, Wikipedia has certain standards of notability — rules of thumb we apply to determine whether or not a topic is significant enough to deserve an article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; if we let everyone create an article about everything, it would quickly be bogged down. That is why it is necessary to draw a line somewhere and decide what is and is not worthy of inclusion.

I'm going to start a discussion to get other Wikipedia users' opinions on the situation, and we'll see what the consensus is about the article you've created. There will be a link to it at the top of the article, and you can come in and give your own opinion if you like. Let me know on User talk:Tgies if you have any questions. tgies (talk) 08:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Afraid of Monsters
I have nominated Afraid of Monsters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Afraid of Monsters&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. tgies (talk) 08:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)