User talk:Clooodel

I nominate this article for deletion because of its unencyclopedic content. It was previously proposed for deletion and the result was: keep. However only seven persons voted before this decision was taken. Seven votes are not representative of the opinion of the community. Thus it is worth reopening the debate. This article was initially written for self-promotion by the European University, as a form of an advertisement for its institution (WP:PROMO). But adding the information of non-accreditation does not change the fact that this topic does not merit its own article on Wikipedia. A topic needs sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet the general notability guideline (WP: NOTE). Merely being true or useful (even verifiable) does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Readers use Wikipedia for encyclopedic information. Wikipedia is not a free advertising space (WP:SPAM), and not even a space to debate about the quality of a company and its products or services. The action of helping student to choose the “right” education is not in line with building an encyclopedia.Clooodel (talk) 13:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European University (2nd nomination)
You have attempted to nominate European University for deletion. However, you did not do this properly, with the result that the AfD page did not show up properly. I have attempted to correct your error by cutting and pasting, but I cannot be 100% certain that the result is quite what it should be. If you wish to nominate any other articles for deletion it will be much better to follow the step-by-step instructions at Articles_for_deletion. If you have any questions, please feel welcome to contact me on my talk page. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)