User talk:Cloud.watching

Your submission at Articles for creation: Museum of Solutions (January 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Museum of Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Museum_of_Solutions Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Museum_of_Solutions reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your input - do you have any advice on what kinds of sources I could add for a relatively new institution? I can add more newspaper articles, but I was worried that would sound advertising-y.
 * I have no affiliation with the space etc, just feel that it is important and a significant step in India's education landscape! Would you recommend waiting till the space has been open for a while? Cloud.watching (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @S0091
 * Sorry to bother you, but I wanted to know if I could have any, more specific feedback. Thanks for your time!
 * Cloud.watching (talk) 14:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Cloud.watching, the sources are over the period of a month, from late November and December which is not a "significant" period of time. That's likely because it just opened.  Looking at the sources the Hindu is great source but most of others are weak because they largely rely on what those affiliated say about the museum.  Design Patiki describes itself as "digital platform" and engages heavily in brand promotion so is a not a good source.  Also, things like their vision, mission, aims, etc. do not belong in an encyclopedia article because it is promotional, even though that is not your intent.  I'd say give it some time for better sources and you want to look for sources that have actually visited the museum.  S0091 (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @S0091Thanks so much - that is really helpful input. I will wait until there are others who have visited the museum and written about it. I will make sure we have more unbiased sources - not directly connected to the museum itself.
 * Thanks! Cloud.watching (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)