User talk:CloudComputation

This is Cloud  Compu  tation 's Talk Page.

You can:
 * Talk to me in my talk page if you think I made a disruptive/suspicious/unconstructive edit.
 * Talk to me to resolve an edit war.

You can't:
 * Post spam or profanity messages in my talk page.
 * Do vandalism to my user page or talk page.

I do not consider it in any way disruptive to distinguish between historical and current processors in Template:Power Architecture
I think it's a useful distinction, and not at all disruptive in the least. Guy Harris (talk) 18:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Let's discuss this over at the talk page of the template. -- Henriok (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:CloudComputation/sandbox (April 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheCascadian&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

The  Cascadian  08:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Please allow
other editors to remove your edits from their talk page. That's seen as an acknowledgement that your edit was read. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 08:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Windows 99 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows 99. Since you had some involvement with the Windows 99 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ï¿½ (talk) 06:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

ANI discussion
See WP:ANI.-- JOJ Hutton  16:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * At the time I imposed this block, I failed to notice that you had not posted anything objectionable in three days. In the spirit of assuming good faith, I have removed the block. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  04:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

"Windows 99" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Windows 99. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  04:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)