User talk:CloudNine/Archive 3

This week's collab
Behold: Nevermind. Right now I've completely restructured the article, added a "Background" section, and filled out the "Recording" section. I've got a few more things to add to "Recording" so that'll be my focus for the time being. I think "Background" could be better, but I just wanted to get the main points written down. Obviously we need more info on what happened after the album was released. I'm not sure if you have any sources I don't (I own Come As You Are, the Classic Albums DVD, and a bunch of Guitar World issues that talk about the band) so let me know if there anything cool you have to add. One last thing: any suggestions for additional soundclips? WesleyDodds 06:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This occured to me: do you have With the Lights Out? Because if you do we can use one of the Smart Sessions demos.  WesleyDodds 20:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doolittle (album)
The article Doolittle (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Doolittle (album) for things needed to be addressed. M3tal H3ad 12:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just remember, when using American grammar in Doolittle, punctuation always goes inside of quotes. I can undertstand it can be a bit of a habit to break (oddly enough, I'm American yet if I'm not writting anything that's going to be copyedited I like to leave my punctuation on the outside of quotes for purely aesthetic reasons). Just be careful! WesleyDodds 21:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Banning spoiler warnings on the Final Fantasy Wikiproject
Hello, I've noticed that you're interested in the video game articles. You might be interested in adding your opinion to the discussion currently taking place on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Final Fantasy. Kariteh 22:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Pixies love
In a 20th anniversary interview for Spin, an interviewer asks Robert Smith of The Cure "What music has most excited you during the past 20 years?" to which Robert Smith responded "Dinosaur Jr. and Pixies." (Spitz, Marc. "Robert Smith." Spin. November 2005) If you want to include that bit in the "Legacy" section go ahead; I couldn't find an opportune area to place it. WesleyDodds 08:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

While searching for "Bam Thwok" reviews on Google, I found this article:. I find it amusing because I was at the actual Pixies concert that they reference in the first two paragraphs. I actually thought they messed up intentionally as an excuse to throw out some witty stage banter. Everyone in the audience was yelling at them to keep on playing. WesleyDodds 00:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Doolittle FA
Congrats! WesleyDodds 02:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You also might want to take a look at the Adore FAC and provide some feedback. WesleyDodds 02:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

SLTS
Thanks, but after the FAC I did for The Smashing Pumpkins I want to fix up any objections that might exist before then. I'll make things (hopefully) smoother for all parties involved. By the way, you mentioned that magazine issue you had about Nirvana. Is there anything you think is interesting or informative you can add to the article from it? WesleyDodds

I was looking at "Teen Spirit" on AcclaimedMusic.net right now. What do you think about adding one of those charts like you've added at Surfer Rosa? I think it might be useful, but given the number of lists, it might be unwieldy. Possibly more important is that according to the site's ranking system "Smells like Teen Spirit" is the fourth-most acclaimed song ever. Now that's insane. WesleyDodds 12:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Would you be able to add a screencap of the "Teen Spirit" music video to the "Music video" section? Preferrably a scene worth commenting on, like the crowd dismantling the set and the band trashing their gear. I asked another user to grab an image, but I'm not sure he'll be able to do it. Aside from that, I'm waiting for a clarification on a music sample question (whether or not we can include clips of both the studio version and the Wishkah version of "Teen Spirit") and clarification on a source (I checked out the appropriate book and the text doesn't mention what is cited, but the original editor did cite from a later edition of the book). Once that's taken care of, I'm taking the page to FAC. WesleyDodds 08:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you replace the current live sample of the song with the studio version? At first I was thinking both versions could be uploaded on Wikipedia, but i'm not sure how fair use works in regards to that, and having the original version of the song seems vastly more important (I doubt any one's looking for a clip of the Wishkah version. Since the song's five minutes, we can actually highlight the dynamics in the song. With 30 seconds a soundclip should be able to cover the end of the verse, the prechorus, and part of the chorus. Another option is to cover the intro and the beginning of the first verse. WesleyDodds 11:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My concern was that fair use says we can only use one clip of a song. While they are two different recordings, it's still the same band playing the same song, so that's what had me worried. WesleyDodds 21:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Bam Thwok
Shucks, thanks, though I still haven't learned to spell. Your cranking out great articles lately, its heart warming to see so many Pixies FAs! Just two things on the Bam Thwok article: the sentence "Bam Thwok" was recorded in a Dreamworks-funded demo session, funded by" is incomplete; and the Horhaus, listentome.net, and Hannah Harper refs are not WP:RS - the first two are blogs, the last is a user contributed review. Hopefully, they're easily replaced. Other than that the article is in rude health. Ceoil 18:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, I think you tackled the problem with the sources very nicely; its odd that there are not more reviews available. Also your probably right that the solo careers stuff is off topic. Ceoil 18:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've searched around for sources, and found nothing. One thing, is there any coverage of the recording on LoudQUIETLoud? Ceoil 18:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

That became FA real quick. Congrats! WesleyDodds 07:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What are you planning to work on after the Pixies articles? WesleyDodds 07:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Kurt Cobain has been sitting at GA forever (and quite frankly the article needs some reworking), and I put Nevermind more or less on hold right now because I figured I might as well make SLTS FA first. Those are what I think are the main Nirvana pages to consider working on. There's always In Utero, and the other band members of course. Personally I've found I really don't care to work on band member pages. After finishing up The Smashing Pumpkins I had plenty of sources with which to add to Billy Corgan. I started working on it, but quickly got bored and gave up. Anyways, good luck on all that! WesleyDodds 07:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Music sources
You might want to post the magazine issue details on both the Alternative Wikiproject and main Music Wikiproject source list pages; I purposefully listed only the articles in each magazine issue relevant to alternative rock, thus excluding hip-hop, pop, and metal-related features, among other genres. I can fill out the articles information for the issues I own for the main Music Wikiproject later, but I think the more specific listings would still be helpful on the Alternative WikiProject source list, especially since people there might be looking for smaller pieces on particular bands within the project's scope. WesleyDodds 12:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I can add details from the Spin "100 greatest albums" feature on Surfer Rosa and Doolittle if you think you can find a place for them. One bit I thought might be worthwhile but I had trouble placing in the Doolittle article was:
 * "We did three weeks of recording, nearly a song a day," recalls producer Gil Norton. "Nearly everything went down live. I knew when I finished it that it was a bit of a rock 'n' roll classic." (Ref: Ganz, Caryn. "Pixies - Doolittle". Spin. July 2005.)
 * The list also includes your standard items of praise that can fill up an article. WesleyDodds 12:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen anything that mentions the "Gigantic" deal. I'll add some more stuff from the Spin top 100 list soon. There's a quote in the Surfer Rosa entry from Frank Black that might be useful where he says "I had gotten kind of obsessed with songs that don't ever change their chord progressions, like 'Roadrunner' by the Modern Lovers [. . .] When you learn things can be simple, it's kind of an epiphany." WesleyDodds 12:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

A thought occured to me: do you own this DVD? I didn't see it cited in the Pixies articles. Aside from containing all the videos, it also contains a documentary on the band. Very useful, as among other things you see Frank Black discussing the band's history while driving around as well as hear praise directly from people like David Bowie, Radiohead, PJ Harvey, and others. WesleyDodds 00:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: WikiProject Alternative music and sources
Hey there. Got your message and I looked at the page. It seems to me though that you have nothing but print sources listed there. I know a good source that isn't print, but I don't know how to add it, you may have heard of it. It's a radio series carried on CFNY-FM called The Ongoing History of New Music, hosted by Alan Cross. It's been running since 1993, and there's an online library of nearly 200 of the episodes. Hope you can add this to your list of sources, because I've listened to quite a few episodes, and there are many interesting facts and detailed content. Cheers. -- Reaper  X  20:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for your invitation. As I do not currently live in an English-speaking country, most of my books and magazines are not in English. Anw, I added a "Q" issue, soon I'll add a "Rolling Stone", both aged about 15 years. :)  --Doktor Who 02:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikibreak? wtf?!!!??--Doktor Who 14:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Joe Sakic
I finally got a chance to finish updating the article based on your suggestions from the Peer Review. So I wouldn't mind if you could take a moment and look over it again, as your advice was helpful the first time around. Thanks. Kaiser matias 02:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Tiffany Adler
the duke 3 were never convicted either, but damn are they sure worthy of an article. If it turns out that she is found innocent, it can be altered to reflect that decision. The fajitagate scandal never made it to trial and it has an article. The whole point is i found out of this from reading the paper, off of yahoo news, a global portal with millions of readers. I searched for it on here, it wasnt here so i created it, it really does meet the WP:BIO requirements.T ALK•Q R C2006•¢ʘñ†®¡ß§ 20:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Trams in Adelaide and the path to FA
Hi CloudNine, in short yes and hopefully within the next few weeks. I've been deliberately not editing it or looking at it to gain what I've seen called "strategic distance". Then I can the look at it with fresher eyes, particularly for style and flow. I would love your help on this one as I do tend to salt-and-pepper puncutation and construct some very odd sentences. I'll drop you a line in the next week or so; I'm still trying to get hold of one picture - a double decker horse tram in adelaide at good resolution - but may have to settle for newsprint quality on this. Keep up the good work on the Pixies ! Peripitus (Talk) 22:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi again CloudNine, I think I've addressed all of your (any my) concerns with the article and put it up on FAC - thanks for the help ! - Peripitus (Talk) 08:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Australia Zoo
In relation to your edit of Australia Zoo this article is part of wikiproject zoo, your edits will be reverted, if you wish to discuss edits of this page please do so on the talk page. You are not in a position to remove information. Please explain "PR puffery"? If you wished to have it removed then you should have added it on the talk page and not merely removed it. Regards CheetahKeeper 12:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Newsletter quotes
Pick one that strikes you best. Every month I'll dig up a new one for the newsletter every month. Just let me know when you need another one:


 * "There are shitloads of meaning in the songs. I don't know what they meaning, but there's still meaning there." - Liam Gallagher


 * "At the end of the day, you can go to a Radiohead show and stroke your fucking beard and watch the fucking cunt complaining, or come see us, put your arms around your best mate, and have it." - Liam Gallagher


 * "He's a precious, miserable bastard. He's all the things people think I am. Morrissey sings the same song every time he opens his mouth. At least I've got two songs, ‘The Love Cats’ and ‘Faith’. If only people knew how easy it is to be in groups like The Smiths . . ." - Robert Smith on Morrissey


 * "I was like totally high and drunk, and I was like [to J. Mascis], 'They fucking beat you to it! You could have done it, you asshole, we could have fucking done it!" - Lou Barlow on when Nirvana's Nevermind became a hit


 * "We just asked ourselves, 'Who had the foresight to sign Devo?'" - Mark Arm on choosing a major label

- WesleyDodds 02:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
Delivered by CloudNine 14:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Music notation
Where'd you get the musical score used in "Monkey Gone to Heaven"? Could you possibly obtain one for the opening guitar riff to "Today"? WesleyDodds 16:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the intro riff at the eleventh fret that repeats four times before the loud guitars enter. Random fact: that riff was the first thing I ever learned how to play on guitar. This article should be going up for FAC soon. WesleyDodds 16:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks a bunch. WesleyDodds 09:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
Hello. This is just a friendly notice that Wikipedia Weekly episode 19 has been released!


 * In this episode:
 * New Mission and Vision statements for the WMF
 * The Chaser springs Jimmy Wales
 * new uses for categories
 * vandalism studies
 * Unreferenced BLPs.

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/05/05/wikipedia-weekly-19/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!

For Wikipedia Weekly —  W ODU P  20:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.

Pearl Jam
I've been busy the last few days, but in the next two days I plan to sit down and completely fill out and cite the history section, then moving to the musical characteristics section. My high ambition it to have it up for GA nomination by Wednesday or Thursday, which I think is doable given how long it took me to revamp "Smells Like Teen Spirit" for GA nomination. I'll still be busy until tomorrow, but if you want to help citing stuff one of the citations, a link to the Rolling Stone article "Five Against the World", has a pretty thorough history of the band up till 1993. I also think we should take out the paragraph about Kurt Cobain's death; interesting, sure, but really has little to do with Pearl Jam. Also, can you see if you find the 1993 Time feature that the cover used on the page comes from? It's not in the Time.com database right now. WesleyDodds 21:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The history's pretty much done; all that's left is a little tightening on the Riot Act section. I'm going to fill out the musical style and legacy sections tonight. Also, some links need retrieval dates. Once I'm done with that (ie. you don't see any edits on the page by me for a while because I'm probably asleep), you can decide if we should put it up for a GA nomination or not. WesleyDodds 00:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Smells Like Teen Spirit
Why did you revert this to incorrect capitalisation, etc.? --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 22:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain
Go ahead and go through Kurt Cobain and (quite boldly) tear out whatever you deem trivial and/or unnecessary (particularly in the early years section) and add cite/fact tags where need be; I'll take care of inserting citations. What are your thoughts on the "suicide dispute" section? To me, that's the most problematic part of the article, so we'll have to work out a proposal for it that we'll then have to post on the article talk page since it causes so much debate there. WesleyDodds 04:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Citing TV documentaries is fine. I thought about splitting out the suicide dispute into another article for a while since there is so much info, but I'm ultimately against it since then such an article would effectively serve as a POV fork. I think was needs to be done is emphasis individuals have their own theories, and not detail what their theories are. WesleyDodds 23:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As for sexuality: it's always struck me as "one of those things Kurt says in interviews", up there with sleeping under the bridge and saying Nevermind sounds like a Motley Crue record. It doesn't need its own section. It's ultimately not all that important in regards to his own sexuality; what's important about it is what it says about his political and social beliefs. WesleyDodds 00:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thoughts? WesleyDodds 09:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Black Lab
Hi, I made some changes according to your suggestions. Let me know if the article needs further work. Thanks. Chubbles 20:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! Chubbles 15:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Passed
Pearl Jam: I have passed this GA nomination, it is now listed at WP:GA. Please see my notes in passing it. Good work and keep it up. Quadzilla99 00:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Minutemen
I thought we had already put a banner on their talk page. They defintiely belong (being part of the sea of mid-80s American punk bands that became alt-rock, ie. Husker Du, Replacements, Meat Puppets, Saccharine Trust, X, etc.) WesleyDodds 17:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just added the banner. We must've just missed tagging it. WesleyDodds 17:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate links to All Music Guide
Just a short note that I've brought up the issue of including duplicate links to All Music Guide in album articles, both in the professional reviews section and the external links section, such as in Doolittle (album), at WT:ALBUM. Feel free to comment there if you have any comments. Have a nice day. --PEJL 13:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Heads up on technology
Hi. I'm working on what may end up being a full rewrite of the article, and you seem to be its most active steward. I'd like to sound out your views on the changes I intend to make so that we can avoid some potential battles over its content.

My work is strictly at an outline level for now; I have to do a lot of research before I can add proper references. However, the main thrust of what I'd like to do is put a much stronger emphasis on the interrelation between the development of human society and technology throughout the article. I think this is the "big story" of technology: agriculture brought about cities; cities brought about complex societies (and writing, among other things); printing spurred the Renaissance; etc. This should not be confused with the "technology and society" stuff that you just removed (which was rambling, unreferenced, and fixated on modern society).

I don't intend to turn the article into a history of technology either, although the story of technology is bound up in its history. I hope to gain in you a co-author of an article that desperately needs scholarly attention. --Father Goose 19:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * [CloudNine's reply]


 * The History section's good, though it's probably too long, considering 9 paragraphs only brings us up to 1 CE. History of technology can take up the overflow.  That article could use better prose anyway; it's rather list-y.


 * Here's my working outline as it stands (the text that goes with it is mostly notes so far):


 * Introduction


 * How technology is developed
 * Incremental/iterative ("prototypes", field testing, gradual refinement, etc.)
 * Contrast with disruptive technology
 * Interactions between cultures
 * Role of warfare
 * Role of urbanization
 * Science and engineering (not a prominent factor until the late 1800s)
 * Corporate/governmental funding ("big science", etc.)
 * Technology as intellectual property
 * Noncompliance in developing nations (the colonial US, modern china, etc.)
 * Open source movement


 * History
 * By era
 * Selected timeline (I want to add a sidebar of 50 or so "most impactful" techs)


 * Influence on human society
 * Transformative technologies (ones that changed "how humans live")
 * As the basis for political (economic and military) power
 * Impact on the modern world (sociological, environmental, etc.)


 * Access to technology
 * Across social classes (historically, much tech was limited to the aristocracy)
 * Writing and the role of literacy
 * Regional/cultural
 * Historical distribution, by continent/civilization
 * Modern distribution
 * Utilization of technology ("adoption")


 * Future technologies
 * Major emerging fields (nanotech, biotech, "green" tech, etc.)
 * Active transitions (LCDs, carbon fiber, digital imaging, etc.)


 * Other species

Let me know if you think there's anything prominently missing from it.--Father Goose 23:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Maria Callas
Re: : am I missing something? That edit didn't appear to do anything. Cheers! Robert K S 17:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain
Sorry about that, I'd assumed that was a typo. Adam McMaster 09:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:TodayIntro.JPG
Did you have any specific songbook or other source that you used for that image? --Brandt Luke Zorn 01:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Herne Bay, Kent and others
Thanks for the barnstar! Note that a number of my comments on the Herne Bay nomination apply to your articles, including dates on captions and too much detail in the Notable residents section. Keep the good work up. CloudNine 16:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Have you addressed SandyGeorgia's prose objection? Just that I've noticed it's been there for a few days, whereas you're usually quick to address such objections. CloudNine 07:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * He advised that I take a few days away from the article so that I'll be more likely to spot problems with prose when I return to it. Epbr123 09:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
Delivered by CloudNine 14:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleted clips
I think all the clips that were deleted were uploaded by the same user (for example, all the Oasis soundclips were deleted, and those were all uploaded because I asked someone to maybe around a year ago). I'm going to see if Ceoil can upload replacements for some of them. WesleyDodds 11:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

re: Image:Velouria.ogg
I would have gladly undeleted for you if you just asked me on my talk page! ;) Do you want me to do that? As long as you add a rationale all is dandy. Riana ⁂  12:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Sorry you weren't informed, there are a lot of bad fair use media files floating around and someone was doing a big cleanup, tagged over a thousand, so I guess some people just got missed out. Riana ⁂  12:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, and I've been deleting a fair few, so you have no idea how pleasant this interaction was for me ;) Someone actually offering to help! Wow... Anyway, take care :) Riana ⁂  12:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Automatic Delivery of WikiProject Alternative music Newsletter?
Hello CloudNine. I see that you usually manually distribute the WP:ALM newsletter. Would you rather have my bot do it, so it's automatically distributed, and you don't have to manually get every user's talk page and paste the newsletter on? If so, just tell me when it's usually delivered, and if it's subst'ed or not. I'll do the rest with my bot. --R Parlate Contribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 18:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Great. I have the directions to myself here. Can you just read them over and make sure they are right? Thanks. --R Parlate Contribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 19:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought the table would be a problem also, but I tried it and had no problem. Also, I added something for the bot to put below the newsletter. Can you check that page again? --R Parlate Contribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 19:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Pearl Jam
I'm willing to help you with Pearl Jam in a supporting role. I've found that working on articles to get them to GA or FA status, I'm very meticulous and slow, and I rewrite my prose several times until I find something I like because my inital attempts can be lacking to my tastes. You work much faster and write more concisely. Also, I don't own any Pearl Jam albums between Vitalogy and Pearl Jam, so we would definitely need to work with others who are more familiar with those works. If you want to take care of the writing and fixing the citations (missing retrieval dates and all) I can look up more references online and possibly in print. The Legacy and Musical Style sections are always the hardest and take the longest because we have to find all these disparate comments by people, but I'll see what I can do. If you want, we can post relevant quotes and weblinks on a temp page or something and then figure out how to work them into the article.

As for "Monkey Gone to Heaven", talk about the basic, obvious things that don't need citation: the key, the differences between sections, the fact that you can hear Kim Deal doing backing vocals, the guitar solo, Black Francis starts screaming when he says "And God is seven!", etc. I think I read an analysis somewhere about the lyrics, particularly the counting part. I also believe there's an Allmusic review of the song; at least, I recall reading one once. WesleyDodds 23:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, here we go: WesleyDodds 00:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I finally got the time today to finish including citations from Our Band Could Be Your Life in Grant Hart. Citing the rest of the article I suppose would have to rely on web sources. WesleyDodds 05:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Derry City F.C./archive2
Hey there. I notice that you review FA nominations. Would you be at all interested in having a look at this one? Possibly you would contribute or add your support? Cheers. Danny InvincibleTalk 02:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Logo
How can I criticize the logo in the article? I know how it was made, why, etc... But, where would I? I also have a source. Xihix 17:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean, but the logo is largely recognized as the Red Hot Chili Peppers logo. Even without the wording, many people recognize the red or black asterisk as the band.  It's on the drum bass of the band.  It's on the official t shirts.  I don't think it should have a separate  section for it, but it should be mentioned somewhere in the article.  Xihix 17:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, many bands have their logo in their info box. Audioslave, Coldplay, Temple of the Dog, The Mars Volta, and many other bands.  So, why not Red Hot Chili Peppers?  Xihix 18:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe I didn't mention them, but AC/DC, The Sex Pistols, and Slayer, all FEATURED ARTICLES, have their band logo in the userbox. Now, good articles that have their logo: Artic Monkeys, Butthole Surfers, Evanescence, Kiss, Nine Inch Nails, Switchfoot, and Tenacious D.  So... All these are godlike articles, Wikipedia-wise, and they all have their logos.  So... Why not Red Hot Chili Peppers?  Xihix 18:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What tag should I use for it? Sorry, the whole copywrite image stuff is confusing... Also, I'll add the logo as soon as I find my source, I forgot where it was.  Xihix 18:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Not at all. I'm sure someone else will argue that the logo shouldn't be there, so this being on the talk page would stop editors before they go changing it.  Xihix 18:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)