User talk:Cloudburst 789

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines (March 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ktr101&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your submission at AfC Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines was accepted
 Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  14:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Help me!
Please help me with... Page going live Hiya there,

I published a new page yesterday and was wondering what is next (when will the page go live etc.).

Many thanks in advance. Cloudburst 789 (talk) 11:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I assume you're referring to Draft:David Taylor (pharmacist), which I moved from your userpage since the Draft space is the appropriate location for articles-in-progress. I'm going to do a little cleanup (mostly for style/formatting), and when I'm done if you think the draft is suitable for inclusion you should submit it following the prompts on the draft page (there will be an Articles for Creation banner at the top). If acceptable, your draft will be moved to the article space; if not, you will receive feedback on how to further improve it. If you want more help, change the help me-helped back into a help me, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Having cleaned up the draft a little bit, I do have some advice before you submit it for review - you will need a number of independent sources that verify the facts you have given on the page; this means references that are not directly connected to him. Without these, notability cannot be demonstrated and the draft will be declined. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 14:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... Hi, I was wondering if someone can help answer my question. I've submitted a draft in August for David Taylor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Taylor_(pharmacist) and the review is still pending. I am aware it might take a while for it to be actioned and I've tried adding a few tags to speed along the process but the system was unable to locate the draft to add tags. I was hoping someone might advise me on what do next?

Many thanks in advance. hope you're all safe. Cloudburst 789 (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * There isn't anything you can do to speed up the review process; reviews are conducted by a limited number of volunteers in no particular order, and as noted on your draft, "There are 3,517 pending submissions waiting for review." You will need to continue to be patient.  I'm not sure what tags you attempted to add, but nothing prevented me from adding a tag as a test with Twinkle.  (leaving your request open for others to look at) 331dot (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I think they may mean the WikiProject 'tags' on the talk page? If this is what you mean, then that may help speed up the process, if a reviewer associated with one of those WikiProjects finds the draft and decides to review it - however, like 331dot said, you'll have to be patient. All you can do currently is make sure that the draft follows Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and is suitably sourced. If you want to improve the draft, have a look at the info under the "How to improve your article" tab of the review pending template at the bottom of the page.  Seagull123  Φ  16:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Taylor (pharmacist) (December 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Taylor (pharmacist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Taylor (pharmacist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:David_Taylor_(pharmacist) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightenbelle&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:David_Taylor_(pharmacist) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:David Taylor (pharmacist)
Hello, Cloudburst 789. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Taylor (pharmacist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:David Taylor (pharmacist)


Hello, Cloudburst 789. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Taylor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)