User talk:Cloudreviewer

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place unblock on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.

OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

This is extremely ridiculus, absurd and annoying. I have no affilation with the suggested website other than been reader, almost on a daily basis.....why...? Because I like it and consider it useful....so useful that I wondered why it hasn't been added to Wikipedia yet....?

I've been an financial supporter for years and YOU invited me to contribute as editor....so, I thought about starting with some minor contributions - after lots of reading and clicking there and there, somehow I managed to add a link - just one link - because I thougt it was the easiest way to start the learning curve. Was it spam...? (read definition of spam: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic) ) no, it wasn't.

It was a totally valid URL linking to an independent, non commercial website, I have no affiliation with it, it offers high quality content, and in no way violates Wikipedia's guidelines. I was actually very surprise when I realized that the link has been deleted.

When I tried to find out the reason why the link has been deleted, somehoe I was redirected to a page with a message stating something about username policy - the message adviced me to change my username, but when I tried to do so another message adviced me to better open a new account rather than apply for a username change....

I opened a new account and inserted the same link - I also thought that somebody might be playing games undoing things just for fun - I also spent hours clicking around trying to find out if I was doing something wrong. Then I got blocked again...

The only reason why I keep writing here, is because I really feel harrased and also feel as if I was inside the film U Turn (Sean Penn/Jennifer Lopez) where I keep asking me: what's wrong with these people...

You keep writing I that I broke the rules. But, nobody seems to be able to tell me which ones. It is like telling a person: you have to go to jail because you broke the law, and when the person asks: which law...? everybody answers: you broke the Civil Law - here are some books read them, everything is written there...in the main time, you go to jail....

I think you should show at least a little bit of respect for the users in the same situation and tell me why was the suggested link deleted in the first place.

And last, but not least I would like you to read this: http://www.economist.com/node/21536580/comments the same is happening to me right now
 * "I have no affilation with the suggested website other than been reader, almost on a daily basis"...Really? Then why are you editing from the same IP as an account with the same name as the owner of that website? Just coincidence? --jpgordon:==( o ) 21:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

My God!!!!! What is wrong with you people...? I keep on writting the same again and again...why don't you just read....yeah, I googled the site's rankings, stats, etc. the owners' name came out...I thought it was a funny name and somehow use it to create an account...and then it happened...when I realized that what I did was stupid, just tried to change the username...and then your system adviced me to rather create a new account....bla, bla, bla....I see this makes no sense...I think by now I have a pretty good idea of what kind of people are running this platform, and I am quite surprised. Negatively surprised. Beware!!! The community will let you know of your mistakes...