User talk:Clover345

Speedy deletion of London Buses route 69
A tag has been placed on London Buses route 69 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) 10:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of London Buses route 76
A tag has been placed on London Buses route 76 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) 10:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, I have reverted your recent copy-and-paste changes to a number of large London railway stations. Please discuss any similar proposed changes on a suitable talk page in future; if the outcome is a consensus to rename a page, they can be moved properly rather than by copy and paste. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia. —Sladen (talk) 02:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Redirect of Talk:London Euston railway station
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:London Euston railway station, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:London Euston railway station is a nonsense redirect page formed as a result of the reversion of page move vandalism (CSD G3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:London Euston railway station, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback!
—Sladen (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Underground lines
I have already been heavily involved in this discussion since autumn 2007. Please see exhibits A and B in Talk:Northern line for example. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 15:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The picture surely should convince you.[[Image:Northern_line_mixed_case_line_diag.JPG|thumb]] Would you change iPod to Ipod? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 13:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I notice you don't deny the lower case "line" in the picture! Anyway, if you want to move "the guardian" please raise the issue on that Talk page. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * But you probably need to ask Guardian Media Group, since they use still use capital G for Guardian. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London Buses route 69


The article London Buses route 69 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable bus-route. No evidence of notability per WP:GNG, and not even an assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London Buses route 76


The article London Buses route 76 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable bus-route. No evidence of notability per WP:GNG, and not even an assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of London Buses route 69
I have nominated London Buses route 69, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/London Buses route 69. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

St Pancras International - naming controversy
Hello, Since you took part in this before, you might like to know that there is a revived proposal under discussion at Talk:St Pancras railway station. -- Alarics (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Warning
You have been edit-warring slowly but persistently on Liancourt Rocks, an article that is under a special article parole imposed by the Arbitration Committee and under a special zero-tolerance rule against edit-warring.

Please make yourself familiar with the special rules of engagement for that article and make sure you discuss all reverts on the talk page in advance, before you make them. You may be blocked from editing otherwise. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Understanding the manometery equation
Hey Clover345,

Even if you are satisfied that there was a typo in answer key for your WP:RDS, I'd still like to understand the problem to know how you came up with the "800". No obligation, of course, but you've piqued my curiosity. -- ToE 05:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, 800 is the actual density as opposed to the relative density which is 0.8. I think I missed that detail out in the question.  Clover345 (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah! So your manometer was filled with alcohol instead of mercury.  Thanks for following up on that.  I've added a note to the archived question. -- ToE 05:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

letting you know
Hi. I combined your questions on road bases and sub bases at the ref desk to avoid overlapping answers. μηδείς (talk) 00:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Rosenblatt transform
Hey Clover! If you don't mind me asking, what brings you to be working with Rosenblatt transforms, and do you have a link to your material or the name of the textbook, so we can understand the context of you mu and your sigma? As far as I can tell, the most relevant WP article might be probability integral transform.

Also, are you squared away with the inequality or did you want a more explicit explanation? It is pretty common for students in an advanced class to stumble on properties of inequalities which they should have learned years ago in algebra. -- ToE 01:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, the rosenblatt transform is part of calculating probabilities using First Order Reliability Method which I don't think Wikipedia has an article on either and to be honest, I can't find many textbooks with a comprehensive review of it. Only academic papers which are quite difficult to understand. Clover345 (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey. I really should have asked that on the reference desk, but since Impsswoon has done so, why don't you mention you application there, and give a link to the paper you are working from, so that we will understand the context of your mu and your sigma. -- ToE 16:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * OK, I understand that you have successfully worked through the algebra problem, but are frustrated that it was such a problem for you. Perhaps you just need to give it time and practice to bring back fluency.


 * Anyhow, could you provide the relevant equation numbers (they are in parentheses, on the right margin) so we don't have to search through the paper to find the particular mu's and sigma's you are interested in. It may be beyond my ability to help, but if you give the equation numbers on the desk and better describe what you are trying to do, someone might come through. -- ToE 22:57, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for all your help. Clover345 (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff=773818929&oldid=773818019 Andy Dingley (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)