User talk:Clownshking

Personal attack
Hello, I'm Boud. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Demographics of Eritrea that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. against me which stated that my intentions in editing were to promote the viewpoint of a particular political party. Your claim that I'm a sockpuppet was also a personal attack. I do not support the TPLF and I am not a sockpuppet. Boud (talk) 03:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Horn of Africa Discretionary Sanctions warning
Boud (talk) 03:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

==

AN/I notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Boud (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

 * Please note that the topic ban covers the topic, broadly construed. This talk page comment could be deemed a violation of your ban. —C.Fred (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Moreover, it's a blatant misreading of the conversations, and shows a profound lack of WP:AGF. No, admins are not letting some people run around as if they are in charge. No, I am not picking sides, and neither is El C. If C.Fred hadn't already warned you I might have dropped a block because that kind of commentary undermines all we're doing here. What you haven't noticed, because you didn't look for it and maybe you didn't care to look, is that I blocked the IP who disrupted your talk page, right here. So no, we're not playing favorites. Drmies (talk) 18:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * let me ask if I am allowed to even ask? Apparently by Bouds history and interactions with editors like myself and others he disagreed, he used the tools of punishment to get what he had obtained which is HOA articles with no counter POVs. Whether the admins intended or not, the outcome is essentially that! On top of that, the admins won’t even consider an SPI, how is any editor to believe there is fairness in this type of treatment. He has gotten more privilege and I can’t even request anything. This all seems rigged especially his use of the HOA sanctions against editors he is attempting to get banned or blocked. Case in point myself. You can block theIP but there are more involved and Boud is involved but you won’t even allow me to get an SPI. Like I said there is Sockpuppetry and admin unintentional collusion happening in this case! I know you all have the powers to block and ban which I totally respect. However just observe the HOA articles and see Boud and his POV editors shift all of those articles to their POV. Take what I say as what will most likely happen if there is no checks and balances.Clownshking (talk) 18:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC) You're continuing to beat a dead horse, on a subject you're topic banned from, after several very clear warnings by several different admins. If this continues you'll be indefinitely blocked next time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * [removed comment]
 * Would you like to make a constructive edit, or shall we interpret that as you requesting your account be indefinitely blocked with your talk-page access revoked? —C.Fred (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've assumed the latter. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)