User talk:Clpo13/Archive 4

Attempt at consensus-building
In an attempt to keep the discussion on the Photo editing talk page in the direction of reaching an agreeable resolution, I have tried to find a slightly different approach. I would really appreciate your constructive criticism on the post that I just made, please see Talk:Photo_editing. Thanks. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 16:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm always glad to help out. --clpo13(talk) 19:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Regarding User 69.144.68.215
It's pretty clear that 69.144.68.215 (talk · contribs) is pushing a biased agenda regarding terminology (see his/her contribs). Ratiocinate (t &bull; c) 21:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So it would appear. I've requested page protection on Mexican-American War, and I'll keep warning him if he keeps it up. --clpo13(talk) 21:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Regarding an edit made by me...
i made that section in Talk:Robert Goren in the first place and realized it was stupid and i was just being confused because i didnt really pay attention to the episode... i guess you can leave it there but i thought it would just create unnecessary confusion to anyone who read it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.116.223 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 13 August 2007
 * It looked like you deleted a lot more than just the section you originally wrote. Anyways, deleting other peoples' comments on a talk page, as you did, is generally considered bad form. That's why I left the note. --clpo13(talk) 01:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

MedCab
I've taken the case, if you don't mind.  Cool Blue  talk to me 01:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't mind at all. --clpo13(talk) 05:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2
Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/DreamGuy 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, David Mestel(Talk) 20:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Secr_kerala_thumb.JPG
Image:Secr_kerala_thumb.JPG is up for deletion. John Vandenberg 13:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification
Thanks for the clarification, i'll make sure to check next time ;-) IamMcLovin 22:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. I always like to make sure everyone's on the same page, since edit summaries can be kinda vague. --clpo13(talk) 05:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Edits to Werewolf
You recently removed a vandalism edit I made on the Werewolf article and sent me a polite warning. In this case, I do feel that the sentence fits the description of vandalism in Wikipedia:Vandalism. As we seem to disagree, I have started a section in the Discussion of Werewolf about the issue of diphenhydramine use. Please contribute to it. Grhabyt 19:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I replied on the article talk page. Sorry for being hasty. --clpo13(talk) 03:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply.
 * By the way, where did you get the idea that I was a new user? I started in 2005. I guess I should get around to creating a user page. Another item on the list...sigh Grhabyt 16:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, when I see a redlink to a user page, I usually think new, but I know that's not always true. What made me really assume you were new was the complete lack of anything on the talk page. That's most often a sure sign of a brand-spanking-new user who has yet to be welcomed or warned or anything. --clpo13(talk) 05:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Definitely not as frequent user as you. But it's all for the best. I have a user page now. Cheers Grhabyt 02:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Jack the Ripper edits
My apologies if my reversions of the text messed up your grammatical fixes. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  17:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, it's not that big of a deal. It's just a bit annoying how everyone (read: DreamGuy and Colin) blindly reverts because they can't agree on a good version of the article, and my edits just get caught in the shuffle. But it's okay, don't worry about it. --clpo13(talk) 18:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

FYI - User talk:24.151.228.60
Removing warnings is now taken as confirmation that they've read them. Don't revert, just notify us at WP:AIV and we will come down hard on them. Good work in the spotting him! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks for letting me know. I was under the impression that removing warnings that were still relevant was bad form. --clpo13(talk) 11:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, it is, but we just use it against them now. "You've removed your warnings, ergo, you've read them, ergo if you vandalise again, it's your own damned fault". I've semi-protected your userpage as a courtesy - you should hear no more trouble from him for a while. I see you'd like to become an admin - my advice is to get onto IRC, so you can talk to us all in real-time, and get opinions from other users on what someone is doing. It's where the party's at, Cody! :P Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 12:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Endgame
It adds nothing unique from what is contained on the author’s main page. I could have taken it to AFD, but a simple redirect seemed the best course. What where your plan for the page? Brimba (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, I did not mean to be harsh, sorry if I was. But I am not sure where you could go with that page. So the redirect seemed self-evident from my prospective, which may not always be the best. Brimba (talk) 06:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)