User talk:Clsc

FIY
You are welcome to leave me a message here. Thank you in advance. When read, your message will be deleted unless a response is required. For that reason this page is mostly blank. There is no need to greet me "Welcome to Wikipedia" as I've been around since before 2006 when I made this account.

Articles for deletion/Flower of Life (geometry) (4th nomination)
Don't worry: The article as it stands now has been thoroughly refocused to an encyclopedic topic. I can't imagine anyone's going to delete it now, and the votes (including a statement from the nominator (that's me!) reflect that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Magdalensberg page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=754640300 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F754640300%7CMagdalensberg%5D%5D Ask for help])


 * Done. (last year). clsc (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Pentimal
Did you read the "Roman numerals" article? VIIII was actually more common than IX in Roman times, and IIII is used on many clock and watch faces or dials down to the present day... AnonMoos (talk) 02:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I have thought about that edit, as my wording was unfortunate. Thanks for reminding me, as I later forgot again. I intended to write that the counting system in question had only symbols for "digit and palm", that is: one ("I": Roman "I") and five ("U": Roman "V"). Unlike the Roman system which also had a symbol for ten ("X"), and more. PS: Perhaps you're right, I have not counted all numbers using Roman numerals, and hence have no frequency statistic. That still leaves the question: Is "frequent" equal to "correct, proper", or just "frequent"? Your link above goes to the section "Alternative forms", as you knew, but you still disguised it omitting the "Alternative forms" from the link text. I find that funny, not offensive, so this remark is tongue-in-cheek: but then I'm Norse, not Roman :) clsc (talk) 01:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I just added what I originally intended, I think/hope you will find it acceptable :) clsc (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)