User talk:Clt1985

Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virtuous (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Davies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caroline Thompson (soldier)


A tag has been placed on Caroline Thompson (soldier) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Virtuous (2014 film)


The article Virtuous (2014 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 14:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Virtuous (2014 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virtuous (2014 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Virtuous (2014 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 11:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

TV shows
Our manual of style states that television shows should be written about in present tense, even if the show is no long produced. "References to the show should be in the present tense since shows—even though no longer airing—still exist, including in the lead (e.g. Title is a...)." WP:TVLEAD Thank you. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blacktino


A tag has been placed on Blacktino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1691449/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RichardOSmith (talk) 07:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kari Gillespie


The article Kari Gillespie has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Actress with no notability to be found as well as no reliable references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LaTeace Towns-Cuellar


The article LaTeace Towns-Cuellar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Unsourced biographical details / biographies
Hi there. I noticed that you recently edited a few biographical articles on living people. The problem is that you added unsourced biographical details and created unsourced biographies. It's especially important that we keep our biographical articles well-sourced, as misinformation in them can damage people in the real world. One thing that you shouldn't ever do is copy data from the IMDB directly into a biographical article, as the IMDB's data is considered unreliable. Birth dates and that sort of thing can be kept blank until a high quality source, such as Entertainment Weekly or the Los Angeles Times, verify it. It's not a big deal to have a few parameters in the infobox empty. It's better to have a short, well-cited article than an article full of unsourced information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:55, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Will Brittain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everybody Wants Some. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:12, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:18, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LaTeace Towns-Cuellar


The article LaTeace Towns-Cuellar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Changing from BLP PROD to Proposed Deletion as my searches found results here and here but nothing to suggest good notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  04:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I nominated your article for deletion because there weren't any good sources to suggest good independent notability. Although IMDb lists credits and other information, the article can't be supported simply by that link (preferably news and magazine coverage is used to establish notability). SwisterTwister   talk  04:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Denise Williamson


The article Denise Williamson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  12:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Be My Teacher


The article Be My Teacher has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable film, did not receive any significant coverage (just some blog reviews and primary sources), does not meet WP:NF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 13:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)