User talk:Clubeditor

Talk page comments
Hi, please don't remove talk page discussions from talk pages as you did in these four edits, without good reason consistent with our talk page guidelines. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Some of the talk is not relevant and the page is being vandalised by several users, why do you have an interest in this page? Refrain from vandalising this page further.Clubeditor (talk) 11:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

You're not going to win any arguments by randomly accusing everyone else of vandalism and sockpuppetry. Go look in a mirror. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 11:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Add users cyphoidbomb Jeraphine Gryphon to WP:SPI sockpuppet vandalism


 * Beware the boomerang. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I am an outsider here probably, but falsely calling for SPI investigations (although it wouldn't start anyways), against a good standing editor, is not to be entertained.  Ethically  Yours! 11:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Civitatis International, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Inappropriate removal of talk page comments against consensus. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Technically it's allowed to remove off-topic comments from article talk pages but I think the comments about sockpuppets and editors are directly relevant to understanding what's going on in that article's editing history, and therefor they should not be removed, at least not now. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Add user Jeraphine Gryphon to documented threats to person made by user cyphoidbomb documented for police CRN investigation, I.P trace Clubeditor (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure anyone understands what you're trying to say here. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Also please don't edit other people's userpages. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)