User talk:Clutchbearing69

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Tin Ceiling has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 20:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Talk:Tin Ceiling constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 20:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Tin Ceiling. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 20:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.


 * We use talk pages to talk. We do not remove the discussion from them.  In general, when you get warnings, you should not ignore them, but stop what you're doing and try to understand why others object.  When you ignore warnings, the only way to get you to stop what you are doing is to block you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * There's no need to make a second unblock request before a neutral admin has reviewed your first request. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I just vehemently disagree and feel that I am looking out for the integrity of the website. -
 * Removing spam links from articles is a VERY GOOD thing to do. Blanking talk pages, as you did to Talk:Tin Ceiling, is not a good thing. I think you are editing in good faith, but may just not be familiar with the interface.  If you look at the history of Talk:Tin_Ceiling, you can see where you repeatedly blanked the discussion page.  If you are willing to take a look at the welcome page and some of the tutorials there, as well as some of our core content policies like Verifiability, Neutral point of view, and No original research, and agree to stop blanking pages, I don't think that FisherQueen would have an objection to you being unblocked.  --B (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I must apologize for my newness in regards to blanking the discussion page. I did add a non-descriptive warning about wearing gloves to avoid injury, but that was removed. I believed that more of a discussion topic than the other commercial/objectionable discussion remarks. I still do not approve of their being there and again ask for their removal. --
 * I could not find where the glove warning was saved, again I am new. I probably did not hit the save button. I did feel it wrong for the page to be blank - please bear with me I am new to the process. ::
 * Yes, I could see that you meant to help, not harm, the encyclopedia, which is why I went for a short block instead of a long one. You're still welcome here, and learning the ropes is tough for everyone. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)