User talk:Clutchdanja1111

Speedy deletion of Physical Education (album)
A tag has been placed on Physical Education (album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DiverseMentality (Discuss it)  08:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Causeascene.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Causeascene.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to At That Point

 * I have reverted your edit to this article that added improperly sourced information. Twitter is not considered a reliable source on which to base article content, and the page you linked to did not appear to mention this alleged upcoming song anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Causeascene.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Causeascene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  21:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cause a Scene


The article Cause a Scene has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * per WP:NSONGS there is no justification for the article as it is a stub. Notability goes beyond charting which by the way is a bubbling under chart and therefore near impossible to verify. It should be deleted and merged to the album. it is unlikely to grow in size.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)