User talk:Cmat2001

Speedy deletion nomination of Tournament Dance Central


A tag has been placed on Tournament Dance Central requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Luk3 (talk) 23:04, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your article Tournament Dance Central
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Tournament Dance Central to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Gronk Oz (talk) 07:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tournament Dance Central


A tag has been placed on Tournament Dance Central, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Walk the Prank— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 23:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DCL Channel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jessie and Wild Ones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * The Real Life (TV series)
 * added links pointing to Camp, Counselor and Brick House


 * List of The Real Life episodes
 * added a link pointing to Colorado City

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did with the article DCL Channel. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 22:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

And that also goes for your other hoax articles: Trivialist (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * List of One vs Time episodes
 * List of She's Fake episodes
 * List of The Real Life episodes
 * List of Wild Ones (TV series) episodes
 * One vs Time
 * She's Fake
 * Tournament Dance Central

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this had been one hoax article and no other potentially bad edits, I would've likely warned you and left it at that. However you created ten hoax pages and you also tried changing content at other pages like with this edit and this one. We could probably chalk that up to you being new but this paired with ten pages that are outright blatant hoaxes is a bit much to ignore and I have to assume that you're predominantly here for mischief, considering that you've been working on the hoax pages since April, which shows a certain level of deliberateness. Now you might be able to be unblocked, but you'd have to do the following:
 * Show that you understand why you were blocked.
 * Show that you understand how the insertion of deliberate misinformation can be seen as disruptive and puts all of your other edits in question.
 * Give an explanation for your actions.
 * Show how you will edit Wikipedia in a beneficial manner if/when you are unblocked.
 * Ultimately what you have to do here is earn back our trust, something that can be difficult given that you've been doing this for almost the entire time you've had an account here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)