User talk:Cmcahil2/sandbox

Peer Review: Liz Vlahos

You're definitely on the right track with the editing and the organization of your page. I think that you should try to find more properties and find a picture to complement your page (pictures are always helpful to the reader. You can try making the title more noticeable, but I like the rest of the headings. You're going to need to add some more references because that will help give the page merit and credibility. You should try adding a little more substance to each section, or add more sections. Otherwise, it seems like you guys have some pretty interesting stuff (the cost per g, reactions). I think if you add some more pictures, graphs, etc, it will make it more reader friendly, but I think you guys will bring it all together because this is a rough draft! Good job so far!

Lizvlahos (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review: Allison Brown

You have a great start on this article with all of the categories you have listed. Continue to add information from credible sources to these categories, maybe in the occurrences and reactions sections. I don't see any references for this information, so make sure to link your information to reliable resources. You've got a nice start on the chem box, just continue to add to it to make it a great source for information! A picture would be helpful and inclusion of other pertinent properties would also be beneficial. You have a great outline in place, just continue to expand what you have! Anbrown4 (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review: Ramin Amirsoltani

Hey guys, like Allison mentioned, I like the sections you guys have laid out thus far. However, with all this information, you guys definitely need some references and citations. The chembox could use some work, but from the other chemicals you guys have so far, I'm sure you just haven't gotten around to it yet. You could definitely use a picture to make it more appealing to the readers. Like Liz mentioned, you could make the title more visible. I think you guys have the right idea, but you just need to expand on your sections. Perhaps, you guys could talk about its uses in the medical field. Anyways, pick some good sources and make sure they're credible and I think you guys will be good to go.

Amirsol2 (talk) 01:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Project Chemicals comment
I don't think we can use anything from here. The references are unsuitable (aggregators, patents). There is confusion between this chemical and some derivatives. Generic safety info of no value, apart from chembox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)