User talk:Cmdprompt

Welcome!
Hello, Cmdprompt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Logan Hinson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dog six (talk) 23:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Logan Hinson


The article Logan Hinson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 23:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Fox Wilson. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Salem, Virginia, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 16:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Bay with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Bay with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 17:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Logan Hinson
Hello, Cmdprompt. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Logan Hinson, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Logan Hinson to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,  Eye snore  23:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Behold A Pale Horse (2013 film)


The article Behold A Pale Horse (2013 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sign of notability meeting WP:NFILM. Zero gnews hits for "Behold A Pale Horse" + hinton

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Bay, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nat Gertler (talk) 07:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Insomnia Effect


A tag has been placed on The Insomnia Effect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO  A& E&uArr;  21:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Beholdapalehorse2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Beholdapalehorse2013.jpg, which you've sourced to (Poster). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 00:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Behold A Pale Horse
Hello, regarding Behold A Pale Horse (2013 film), we only include topics on Wikipedia if they are considered notable. A topic is considered notable if it has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". It does not appear that this film is notable, which was why it was proposed for deletion. Please take a look at Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Can you please let me know if you still think the topic is notable for Wikipedia? Thanks, Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 14:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Logan Hinson


The article Logan Hinson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sign of meeting WP:NOTABILITY; TV show is a public access show.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello, please read the notice that you removed. "Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed." The notice needs to stay, so please do not remove it. It is recommended to review the comments at Articles for deletion/Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film) to understand why it will be deleted. Topics need to be notable for there to be articles on Wikipedia; see Notability. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Please stop removing the notice. Its removal is not going to prevent the outcome of the AfD. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 04:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film)


A tag has been placed on Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Regarding your message on the film article's talk page, we have policies and guidelines to follow on Wikipedia. Among these is criteria on including certain topics. At Articles for deletion/Behold a Pale Horse (2013 film), editors stated that this topic was not notable. Perhaps it will become notable by receiving coverage as you expect it to, and we can renew discussion then. It is basically too soon at this point to have an article because no one can guarantee that a topic will become notable. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eminem was changed by Cmdprompt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880307 on 2013-03-05T18:17:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eminem with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Eminem with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Salem, Virginia. DVdm (talk) 18:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)