User talk:Cme007

Welcome!
Hello, Cme007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please discuss Murray Rothbard changes at talk and do not WP:edit war. Thanks. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie)  17:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I'll let others take you to WP:Editwarring about this. There are better ways to deal with the POV editing in that section -- and the whole article -- than including irrelevant quotes and poorly sourced commentary. Please learn wikipedia policies if you want to be an effective editor and not get kicked off. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie)  18:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * CME, please read the policy/guideline links above. Also, the Rothbard article is subject to certain sanctions. (See the article talk page.) You must use more caution and discussion when editing this particular article. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Your recent editing history at Murray Rothbard shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. I removed your last edit to Murray Rothbard as there is no consensus for it, and you have now inserted it against consensus for it multiple times. The way forward, is to discuss the change you want at the article's talk page and try to gain consensus for your view. Please don't insert your preferred version because you have discussed it at talk page and only then if you manage to get consensus for the change. I know it can be frustrating, but this is how Wikipedia works, and we all have to apply by this rule of disscussing controversial changes at the talk page (where we may be successful - or not). Regards, Iselilja (talk)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Murray Rothbard. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Favonian (talk) 22:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)