User talk:Cmglee/archive2022

Wikiversity Node Cambridge, 19-20 January, 2022
Following the success of the Decolonise Art History Wiki Jam in November 2021 our next step is the establishment of a pop-up Bricks and Clicks Wikiversity Node. Please see Wikiversity Node Cambridge. Leutha (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Surface area to volume ratio
Hi, I came to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-area-to-volume_ratio and your graph as I was working on a lesson for a lab I teach at our local community college.

I am not sure I understand all that you show on the graph, thus I'm trying to contact you. I really like the way you show so many shapes. What do the blue lines at 70 and 280 indicate?

Also, there are no unit labels on either axis. Why is this?

How did you come to collaborate on this page? Do you know who wrote the content?

Thanks gleejb

Also, I couldn't help notice that you have "glee" in your user name. Could I ask why? I'm because glee is my middle name, and j & b are my other initials.



Gleejb (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC) cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 02:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message and compliment. The length unit is arbitary, as long as they are powers of the same unit i.e. the surface area is in unit&sup2; (e.g. furlong&sup2;) and volume in unit&sup3; (e.g. furlong&sup3;). The blue lines show that when the volume is increased 8 (i.e. 2&sup3;) times (50 to 400), the surface area increases 4 (i.e. 2&sup2;) times (70 to 280).
 * The way Wikipedia works is that anyone can edit the content (of unlocked pages, including Surface-area-to-volume ratio). On 14 June 2013, I found the previous graph misleading and drew an earlier version of the current graph. Talk:Surface-area-to-volume_ratio has the discussion on it. Re who wrote the content, see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surface-area-to-volume_ratio&action=history.
 * Nice middle name you have! Its being in my nick is, I suppose, serendipitous. The nick actually comprises three initials and a family name. Nevertheless, glad to know of another "glee" :-)
 * Best wishes in your lab lesson preparation,

Comment request for HappyOrNot
Hello Cmglee! You commented HappyOrNot earlier and I've edited it since. Could you take another look and see if the warnings added a year ago are still valid? The diff is here. Thank you! Jjanhone (talk) 15:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC) cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 02:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * To be frank, I'm neither an expert on NPOV nor particularly concerned one way or another about your company. My only involvement was adding File:Feedback_automat.jpg and giving my opinion on the article when asked. My only concern is that your being an insider of the company, there is a conflict of interest, and it is likely very difficult to have an impartial perspective.
 * Cheers,
 * Cheers,
 * Thanks for your reply!Jjanhone (talk) 08:42, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Original research
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Jessen's icosahedron, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.

Especially, please do not do this to recently-promoted Good Articles, as by doing so you are endangering the article's Good Article status. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Fair reversion. My bad, cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 12:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Comment request
Any chance you could comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Lists.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail!
 Just ' i ' yaya  07:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks so much for your recognition. It means much to me that someone finds my work useful. Do let me know if there are any concepts you'd like illustrating in the future. Cheers, cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 20:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Cmglee,

This is to let you know that File:Everest-3D-Map-Type-EN.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for 2022-06-21. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-06-21. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! — PerfectSoundWhatever  (t; c) 13:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Bayes' theorem
Hi. Just thought you should know about a discussion regarding one of your images. Thanks. Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. I've replied there. Cheers, cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 00:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks so much for your support, the number of people feeling so strongly against the image baffles me, so I much appreciate your kind words. Cheers, cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 18:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Cmglee- It's only gotten worse since you've commented! The article's been edit-protected. It baffles me too! Many are vehemently against the suspicion. Literally all you did was change it from beards to crewmates... — That Coptic Guy (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh well, I don't feel strongly whether it's the beards or crewmates image – can't win every battle... cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 21:29, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)