User talk:Cmh02010

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.G. Morgan (June 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P.G. Morgan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.G. Morgan (June 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P.G. Morgan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  12:11, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.G. Morgan (July 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P.G. Morgan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

reply
16:11:06, 2 July 2017 review of submission by Cmh02010[edit source] | Archive Cmh02010 (talk · contribs) Draft:P.G. Morgan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Legacypac, I don't understand your comment. Why would I remove links from the body of the article? Linking allows the reader to explore names and events beyond the article in question, and further provides verification on the topic. I have also provided inline citations throughout the article. Can you clarify? Thanks! Cmh02010 (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Inline citations are a must. If you have closely related External links (maybe the subject's website) put them in a separate section at the end. Don't put links in the body. Look at some well developed articles for examples - any big topic like Donald Trump or ISIL or Madonna or some other pages that have lots of editor attention. Hopefully that is clear but feel free to ask any more questions. Legacypac (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.G. Morgan (July 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P.G. Morgan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:P.G. Morgan has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:P.G. Morgan. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  05:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:P.G. Morgan has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:P.G. Morgan. Thanks! JSFarman (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P. G. Morgan has been accepted
 P. G. Morgan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sb2001 talk page 02:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

PG Morgan
I'm not sure you're aware of this, but if you write that you added a "ref" in the edit summary, you actually need to add a ref that verifies the assertion of the statement. It's philosophically similar to "If you add a ref about PG Morgan, it should be about PG Morgan, not a different guy named Morgan!" I hope this helps. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! JSFarman (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Marina Zenovich
I've noticed you've added back some non-neutral words, eg, "widely considered". Just letting you know that they may not be accepted in the review. It will be up to the wikipedia administrators. Thanks, Abonzz (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC) 20:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)