User talk:Cmk1234

April 2018
Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Irish slaves myth seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Irish slaves myth, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Irish slaves myth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:08, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality is not the same as the balance fallacy.
My edit was factually correct and cited. The original post is neither neutral nor accurate. Trying to present something as neutral when it is inherently wrong is itself bias. Would you continue to allow a page justifying African slavery as 'not that bad?' I think not. Cmk1234 (talk) 01:11, 26 April 2018 (UTC)


 * WP:RGW. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)