User talk:Cmmgood

Welcome!
Hello, Cmmgood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 07:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to William Cosby has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Cosby. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at William Cosby, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Martha Stewart. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''You have been warned about this type of lead edit in BLPs before. That's not what she is best known for and is WP:UNDUE to add it to the first line of the lead. It is sufficiently well covered in the article and even in the lead.'' Meters (talk) 05:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, the "and convicted felon" phrase has been re-inserted into the Martha Stewart article intro sentence. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)