User talk:Cnbrb/Archive/2017

Signature
I notice that on a couple of your recent messages on a talk page you've signed with a date and time but no user name. I wonder whether you accidentally used 5 tildes rather than 4? --David Biddulph (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I use the four tildes but it doesn't work for some reason. Are 5 tildes also a thing? Cnbrb (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just testing the 5 tildes. 14:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't know 5 tildes even existed but it must be the reason.Cnbrb (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There are three forms, see WP:3TILDES, WP:4TILDES, WP:5TILDES. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 00:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you - you learn something new every day! (now carefully types 4 tildes...) Cnbrb (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LUL line label
Template:LUL line label has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 15:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Didsbury School of Education
Hello - The information you've added to the History section repeats quite a lot of the detail that's already there in the Architecture section, including architect, Temple of the Winds, Plymouth Grove etc. I don't think it's needed in both places, and my own preference would be for it to sit in the Architecture section. KJP1 (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Moved before I'd even finished. The extra detail's very good. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 12:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh I was hoping nobody would notice until I'd corrected it! You're too quick....! I've merged the duplicate content and am making a couple of historical additions. Thanks Cnbrb (talk) 12:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Manchester Metrolink, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middleton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metroshuttle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SELNEC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alderaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aldbury, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bust and Hind. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tatooine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

BR Logos
Thanks....

Let's see what the response is. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * We shall see - there's definitely a lot of legal inconsistency which could be tightened up, although obviously I have my view against deletion.... we'll see what happens! Cnbrb (talk) 10:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Didsbury School of Education
Hi, I have significantly expanded and improved this article over the past few weeks and I was wondering if you, as one of the original contributors to the article, could possibly cast your eye over it? I'm hoping to take it to GA/FA before long. Many thanks. Aiken D 23:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi - wow! Well done, a lot of work! I'll look at it sometime - so good to see such a big contribution. thank you for all your work.Cnbrb (talk) 11:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cassiobury House
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cassiobury House you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 08:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cassiobury House
The article Cassiobury House you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cassiobury House for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 14:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Busses in MK
I reverted your edit to Buses in Milton Keynes because you seem to have had a senior moment? MK is nowhere near the L&D busway. The 99 service from MKC to LTN runs on the ordinary road beside the busway for a couple of miles but that's as close as it gets. Or have I totally misunderstood? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi - thanks for the heads-up. Don't think I've quite got to the stage of "senior moments"... yet! Of course, it might have helped if I had added some sort of references, for which I apologise. Anyway, here's the official info, indicating that the Busway services now run all the way to MK.  Here's the Busway website if you want to investigate further. Perhaps you'd like to find some more precise info and update as you think is appropriate. Cnbrb (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Foundling Hospital Anthem at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

DS alert
QuackGuru ( talk ) 19:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Foundling Hospital Anthem
Alex ShihTalk 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Nice DYK. - I am working on a "recent death", - I simply have no time to blow up something small, sorry. I think I made two useful suggestion: go to the article talk, and a name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Fine, no worries. I'll leave it. Cnbrb (talk) 13:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Goodness me! Thank you!! Cnbrb (talk) 17:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pound sterling banknotes fan.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Pound sterling banknotes fan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Move discussions
Hi, Cnbrb. Thanks for starting those move discussions for Oxford Book of Tudor Anthems and Oxford Book of English Madrigals. I should clarify, though, that my previous request wasn't withdrawn for lack of consensus. What happened was I requested several similar moves (for New Oxford Book of Carols, Oxford Book of Tudor Anthems, Oxford Book of Carols, New English Hymnal, English Hymnal, English Missal, and Anglican Missal) at WP:RM/TR. They were all contested, resulting in six separate and concurrent RM discussions (for some reason, I think New English Hymnal was forgotten about so no discussion was started). In consultation with, I withdrew all of the requests that hadn't been commented on yet so as to ensure that I could devote myself fully to the discussions.

The discussion at remains ongoing if you wouldn't mind lending your two cents. And regarding the other withdrawn requests and the forgotten request, might you be interested in starting RM discussions for English Hymnal, New English Hymnal, and English Missal?

Thanks again, 142.161.81.20 (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi thanks for getting in touch. Oh! It's all so complicated! I'll see if I can chip in - I wish there was somewhere that these discussions could be conducted in one place as a matter of naming conventions rather than on an ad-hoc basis. Cnbrb (talk) 22:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Heddwch ac ewyllys da

 * Diolch yn fawr iawn! Have a great Christmas yourself! Cnbrb (talk) 01:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)